2 + 2 + 2 + ⋯ 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ?
Clarification : Both the numerator and denominator are infinite sequences.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Dude...infinite/infinite is indeterminate, not undefined!
Nooo, look. Let's define S n 1 = Σ i = 1 n 1 and S n 2 = Σ i = 1 n 2 . Both are well defined sequences that satisfy the relation: S n 2 = 2 S n 1 , for all n ∈ N ; therefore, if we define S 3 n = S n 2 S n 1 = 2 1 for all n ∈ N . . Since S n 3 is independent of n , then we have the limit: n → ∞ lim S n 3 = 2 1 .
You're making a huge mistake, which is equivalent to affirm that x → x 0 lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = g ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) , when both f ( x ) , g ( x ) are discontinuous at x = x 0 .
Log in to reply
Your definition of S n 3 implies that you're taking the number of terms in the numerator and denominator to be equal; that is, you're computing the limit of 2 1 , 2 + 2 1 + 1 , 2 + 2 + 2 1 + 1 + 1 , … . This is indeed 2 1 , but that's not what the problem is asking. The numbers of terms aren't necessarily going in the same rate. It's possible that the expression is to be interpreted as 2 1 + 1 , 2 + 2 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 , 2 + 2 + 2 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 , … , for example, with a different limit (1), so it is undefined.
This is the same issue with ∫ − ∞ ∞ x d x . Some people argue that this means n → ∞ lim ∫ − n n x d x = n → ∞ lim 0 = 0 , but this is incorrect, since the two boundaries can approach infinity in different rates; for example, it's possible to interpret the expression as n → ∞ lim ∫ − n 2 n x d x = n → ∞ lim 2 3 n 2 = ∞ , so it's also undefined.
Log in to reply
yes, i made a mistake assuming the same number of element in every sum. i apologize...
I want to know after doing both summations,putting limits where is the discontinuity and why we should not apply limits
Log in to reply
@DIVYA ASHISH consider this: n → ∞ lim ( n − n ) = 0 but consider this: ( x , y ) → ∞ lim ( x − y ) This is not≠0, similarly, here there are two different series so there is not one variable in the limit but two.
Suppose n , m the number of elements of each series: S n 1 = ∑ i = 1 n 1 = n and S n 2 = ∑ i = 1 m 2 = 2 m . Defining S n , m 3 = S m 2 S n 1 = 2 1 m n .
You can see that the limit lim ( n , m ) → ∞ S n , m 3 does not exists. It depends on the "trajectory". For example: n = m ⇒ ( n , m ) → ∞ lim S n , m 3 = 2 1 .
n = m 2 ⇒ ( n , m ) → ∞ lim S n , m 3 = ∞ .
m = n 2 ⇒ ( n , m ) → ∞ lim S n , m 3 = 0 .
Hi I am confused on your usage of S notation, is this an arithmetic sequence? Forgive my ignorance..
You made a fundamental mistake from the beginning when you claimed that S n 2 = 2 S n 1 . Their relationship is not that.
Log in to reply
That equation is correct for all n . Note that the definitions there are finite sums and thus defined.
∞/∞ is actually 1.
Rather indeterminate
Well , Both are constant GP's , so by sum of infinite GP , it comes out to be 0 1 , which is surely indeterminate .
Log in to reply
individually numerator and denominator is infinite but what about their ratio?
Using infinite geometric series, a/(1-r) We get that 1+1+1+1......= 1÷0. Hence it is undefined
You cant use infinite sequence for this because r must be a fraction i.e (-1,1)
1+1+1+1... = inf while 2+2+2+2... = inf. but inf/inf = N/a
for being 1/2 we´ll have to take the same terms in both sides of the operation
Can you elaborate, please?
Log in to reply
I agree this is a bad answer. What about arguing the sequences both add up to infinity(they are both infinite sequences) However, there are different types of infinity: in this example, infinity=2xinfinity. Moreover, it is not a number but rather a concept, used to represent the biggest number(there is no biggest number). It is used as a number sometimes and is helpful to mathematicians, but it holds many different 'values' and can not be used in arithmetic as it is not a true number. This problem is relevant to the Wiki on infinity divided by infinity. Is this more helpful?
2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + ⋯ 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ∞ ∞ = 0 . 5 , 1 , 2 .
∞ ∞ is undefined .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
infinite/infinite=undefined