Evaluate
( 2 2 0 0 0 ) + ( 5 2 0 0 0 ) + ( 8 2 0 0 0 ) + ⋯ + ( 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 ) ( m o d 1 0 0 0 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You have done a mistake that when you have changed summation limits of 2^r, there must be 199 not 19. Still the answer will be 125.
Log in to reply
Thanks a million, I have corrected the bit. Also, I hope everyone who has read the solution wasn't confused by the part. :)
If you have time, may you help me have a look at this problem and proofread my solution there? I don't have time to check mine as I'm too busy. Hope you will also enjoy the problem. :)
Yes thats right
Log in to reply
Thanks for confirming it too. Just done the correction. You may have a look now. :)
The hint is to use cube roots of unity, but really great problem :).
Can you elaborate further?
Log in to reply
Let a be one of the complex cube roots of 1, and a^2 as the other. Now compute (1+1)^2000, (1+a)^2000, and (1+a^2)^2014, and cancel, using the binomial theorem, and bearing in mind that 1+a+a^2=0, and a^(3k+m)=a^m.
Just have a question for you. How are you so good at calculus?
Log in to reply
Interesting story:
When I was in 5th grade (class 5), I was like, the biggest hippy/jock/hipster ever. I wore skinny-jeans, swore, and had a girlfriend. It was the most embarrassing time of my life. Anyways, I realized how stupid I was in 6th grade, and totally reshaped myself. I went on Khan Academy, and instead of learning all of the basics, I jumped straight into Calculus. Which didn't help me at all with school, I was 12th on the math team, and I was in Foundations of Algebra. Over the summer, I filled in all of the stuff I hadn't learned, and so now I'm pretty much a Calc 2 level guy sitting in Algebra 1, which is unbelievably easy. The only thing good about that is that I'm insanely good at Calculus. Not so much at Algebra, but at Calculus, yes.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider ( 1 + z ) 2 0 0 0 = r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) z r .
Putting z = 1 into the above equation yields
\begin{aligned} && 2^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} &&\tag{1} \end{aligned}
Let 1 , ω , ω 2 be the distinct roots of z 3 = 1 .
Consider
z ( 1 + z ) 2 0 0 0 = r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) z r + 1 .
Putting z = ω and z = ω 2 respectively yields
\begin{aligned} && \omega (1+\omega)^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \omega^{r+1}&& \tag{2} \\ && \omega^2 (1+\omega^2)^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \omega^{2(r+1)} &&\tag{3} \end{aligned}
Note that ω 2 + ω + 1 = 0 and also that ( ω n ) 2 + ω n + 1 = 0 for n is not divisible by 3 . These two are important in the following.
Adding up the right-hand sides of ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) yields
= = r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) + r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) ω r + 1 + r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) ω 2 ( r + 1 ) r = 0 ∑ 2 0 0 0 ( r 2 0 0 0 ) ( ω 2 ( r + 1 ) + ω r + 1 + 1 ) 3 r = 0 ∑ 6 6 6 ( 3 r + 2 2 0 0 0 )
where we exploit ω 2 ( r + 1 ) + ω r + 1 + 1 = ( ω r + 1 ) 2 + ω r + 1 + 1 = { 0 , 3 , r = 3 k − 1 r = 3 k − 1 where k is a positive integer.
Hence
r = 0 ∑ 6 6 6 ( 3 r + 2 2 0 0 0 ) = 3 2 2 0 0 0 + ω ( 1 + ω ) 2 0 0 0 + ω 2 ( 1 + ω 2 ) 2 0 0 0 = 3 2 2 0 0 0 + ω ( − ω 2 ) 2 0 0 0 + ω 2 ( ω ) 2 0 0 0 = 3 2 2 0 0 0 + ω 4 0 0 1 + ω 2 0 0 2 = 3 2 2 0 0 0 + ω 2 + ω = 3 2 2 0 0 0 + ( − 1 ) = 3 2 2 0 0 0 − 1
Then now consider
\begin{aligned} \frac{2^{2000} -1}{3} & = \frac{1}{3} \sum^{1999}_{r=0} 2^{r} \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0}2^{10r}\left(1+ 2 + 2^4 + \cdots + 2^9\right)\\ &= \frac{1}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0}2^{10r} \cdot (2^{10} - 1)\\ &= \frac{1023}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0} 1024^r\\ &\equiv 341 \sum^{199}_{r=0} 24^r \quad \quad \tag{mod 1000}\\ &= 341 \left(1 + 24 + 24^2 + 24^3 + \cdots + 24^{198} + 24^{199}\right)\\ &= 341 \left[1+ 24 + \overbrace{\left(24^2 + 24^3\right) + \cdots + \left(24^{198} + 24^{199}\right) }^{99 \text{ brackets }} \right]\\ &\equiv 341 \left(25 + \overbrace{400 + \cdots + 400}^{99 \text{ terms }} \right) \quad \quad \tag{ mod 1000 }\\ &= 341 \left(400 \times 99 +25\right)\\ &= 341 \left(40 \times 990 +25\right)\\ &\equiv 341 \left[40 \times (-10) +25\right]\ \tag{ mod 1000 }\\ &= 341 \left(-400 +25\right)\\ &\equiv 341 \left(600 +25\right) \tag{ mod 1000}\\ &\equiv 125 \tag{ mod 1000 }\end{aligned}
where we use 2 4 2 n + 2 4 2 n + 1 = 2 4 2 n ( 2 5 ) = 2 4 2 ( n − 1 ) × 1 4 4 0 0 ≡ 4 0 0 ( mod 1000 ) for all natural numbers n .