Insanely huge binomials!

Evaluate

( 2000 2 ) + ( 2000 5 ) + ( 2000 8 ) + + ( 2000 2000 ) ( m o d 1000 ) {2000 \choose 2} + {2000 \choose 5} + {2000 \choose 8} + \cdots + {2000 \choose 2000} \pmod {1000} .


The answer is 125.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Wing Tang
Feb 22, 2016

Consider ( 1 + z ) 2000 = r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) z r \displaystyle \left(1+z\right)^{2000} = \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} z^r .

Putting z = 1 z = 1 into the above equation yields

\begin{aligned} && 2^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} &&\tag{1} \end{aligned}

Let 1 , ω , ω 2 1, \omega, \omega^2 be the distinct roots of z 3 = 1 z^3 = 1 .

Consider

z ( 1 + z ) 2000 = r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) z r + 1 \begin{aligned} & & z\left(1+z\right)^{2000} & = \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} z^{r+1} \end{aligned} .

Putting z = ω z= \omega and z = ω 2 z = \omega^2 respectively yields

\begin{aligned} && \omega (1+\omega)^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \omega^{r+1}&& \tag{2} \\ && \omega^2 (1+\omega^2)^{2000} &= \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \omega^{2(r+1)} &&\tag{3} \end{aligned}

Note that ω 2 + ω + 1 = 0 \omega^2 + \omega + 1 = 0 and also that ( ω n ) 2 + ω n + 1 = 0 \left(\omega^n\right)^2 + \omega^n + 1 = 0 for n n is not divisible by 3 3 . These two are important in the following.

Adding up the right-hand sides of ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) (1), (2) \text{ and } (3) yields

r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) + r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) ω r + 1 + r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) ω 2 ( r + 1 ) = r = 0 2000 ( 2000 r ) ( ω 2 ( r + 1 ) + ω r + 1 + 1 ) = 3 r = 0 666 ( 2000 3 r + 2 ) \begin{aligned} & \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} + \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \omega^{r+1} + \sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r}\omega^{2(r+1)} \\ = &\sum^{2000}_{r=0} {2000 \choose r} \left( \omega^{2(r+1)}+ \omega^{r+1} + 1\right)\\ =& 3 \sum^{666}_{r=0} {2000 \choose 3r+2} \end{aligned}

where we exploit ω 2 ( r + 1 ) + ω r + 1 + 1 = ( ω r + 1 ) 2 + ω r + 1 + 1 = { 0 , r 3 k 1 3 , r = 3 k 1 where k is a positive integer. \omega^{2(r+1)} + \omega^{r+1} +1 = \left(\omega^{r+1}\right)^2 + \omega^{r+1} +1 = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} 0, & r\neq 3k - 1 \\ 3, & r = 3k- 1\end{array}\right. \text { where } k \text{ is a positive integer.}

Hence

r = 0 666 ( 2000 3 r + 2 ) = 2 2000 + ω ( 1 + ω ) 2000 + ω 2 ( 1 + ω 2 ) 2000 3 = 2 2000 + ω ( ω 2 ) 2000 + ω 2 ( ω ) 2000 3 = 2 2 000 + ω 4001 + ω 2002 3 = 2 2000 + ω 2 + ω 3 = 2 2000 + ( 1 ) 3 = 2 2000 1 3 \begin{aligned} \sum^{666}_{r=0} {2000 \choose 3r+2} &= \frac{2^{2000} + \omega (1+\omega)^{2000}+ \omega^2(1+\omega^2)^{2000} }{3}\\ &= \frac{2^{2000} + \omega (-\omega^2)^{2000}+ \omega^2 (\omega)^{2000} }{3}\\ &= \frac{2^2000 + \omega^{4001} + \omega^{2002}}{3}\\ &= \frac{2^{2000} + \omega^2 + \omega}{3}\\ &= \frac{2^{2000} + (-1)}{3}\\ &= \frac{2^{2000} - 1}{3} \end{aligned}

Then now consider

\begin{aligned} \frac{2^{2000} -1}{3} & = \frac{1}{3} \sum^{1999}_{r=0} 2^{r} \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0}2^{10r}\left(1+ 2 + 2^4 + \cdots + 2^9\right)\\ &= \frac{1}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0}2^{10r} \cdot (2^{10} - 1)\\ &= \frac{1023}{3} \sum^{199}_{r=0} 1024^r\\ &\equiv 341 \sum^{199}_{r=0} 24^r \quad \quad \tag{mod 1000}\\ &= 341 \left(1 + 24 + 24^2 + 24^3 + \cdots + 24^{198} + 24^{199}\right)\\ &= 341 \left[1+ 24 + \overbrace{\left(24^2 + 24^3\right) + \cdots + \left(24^{198} + 24^{199}\right) }^{99 \text{ brackets }} \right]\\ &\equiv 341 \left(25 + \overbrace{400 + \cdots + 400}^{99 \text{ terms }} \right) \quad \quad \tag{ mod 1000 }\\ &= 341 \left(400 \times 99 +25\right)\\ &= 341 \left(40 \times 990 +25\right)\\ &\equiv 341 \left[40 \times (-10) +25\right]\ \tag{ mod 1000 }\\ &= 341 \left(-400 +25\right)\\ &\equiv 341 \left(600 +25\right) \tag{ mod 1000}\\ &\equiv 125 \tag{ mod 1000 }\end{aligned}

where we use 2 4 2 n + 2 4 2 n + 1 = 2 4 2 n ( 25 ) = 2 4 2 ( n 1 ) × 14400 400 ( mod 1000 ) 24^{2n} + 24^{2n+1} = 24^{2n} (25) = 24^{2(n-1)} \times 14400 \equiv 400\ (\text{mod 1000}) for all natural numbers n n .

You have done a mistake that when you have changed summation limits of 2^r, there must be 199 not 19. Still the answer will be 125.

Archit Agrawal - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks a million, I have corrected the bit. Also, I hope everyone who has read the solution wasn't confused by the part. :)

If you have time, may you help me have a look at this problem and proofread my solution there? I don't have time to check mine as I'm too busy. Hope you will also enjoy the problem. :)

Wing Tang - 5 years, 3 months ago

Yes thats right

avi solanki - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for confirming it too. Just done the correction. You may have a look now. :)

Wing Tang - 5 years, 3 months ago
Phil Peters
Apr 14, 2014

The hint is to use cube roots of unity, but really great problem :).

Can you elaborate further?

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Let a be one of the complex cube roots of 1, and a^2 as the other. Now compute (1+1)^2000, (1+a)^2000, and (1+a^2)^2014, and cancel, using the binomial theorem, and bearing in mind that 1+a+a^2=0, and a^(3k+m)=a^m.

Phil Peters - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Can you give a complete solution?

Nathan Ramesh - 7 years, 1 month ago
Finn Hulse
Apr 14, 2014

Fantastic problem Sharky!

Just have a question for you. How are you so good at calculus?

Sharky Kesa - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Interesting story:

When I was in 5th grade (class 5), I was like, the biggest hippy/jock/hipster ever. I wore skinny-jeans, swore, and had a girlfriend. It was the most embarrassing time of my life. Anyways, I realized how stupid I was in 6th grade, and totally reshaped myself. I went on Khan Academy, and instead of learning all of the basics, I jumped straight into Calculus. Which didn't help me at all with school, I was 12th on the math team, and I was in Foundations of Algebra. Over the summer, I filled in all of the stuff I hadn't learned, and so now I'm pretty much a Calc 2 level guy sitting in Algebra 1, which is unbelievably easy. The only thing good about that is that I'm insanely good at Calculus. Not so much at Algebra, but at Calculus, yes.

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...