This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nah, I just kinda randomly picked 89 and turns out it was correct :)
Log in to reply
+1 for making me laugh.
Note first that both 9 and 9 9 are odd.
Now by the binomial theorem, for any odd (positive) integer, we have that
9 n = ( 1 0 − 1 ) n = 1 0 0 ∗ C + 1 0 n − 1 for some C ≥ 0 .
(This is because 1 0 2 will be a factor in every other term of the expansion.)
Now with k being the units digit of n , we have that 1 0 n ≡ 1 0 k ( m o d 1 0 0 ) .
Thus, for odd n , 9 n ≡ ( 1 0 k − 1 ) ( m o d 1 0 0 ) , and so 9 9 ≡ 8 9 ( m o d 1 0 0 ) .
But then, as the last digit of 9 9 is 9 , we in turn have that 9 9 9 ≡ 8 9 ( m o d 1 0 0 ) .
As one can see, the same result will hold for any "power tower" of 9 's.
It's good that we have a slightly different way to think about this stuff...so we both get to write a solution ;) (+1)
A simple and hit-and-trial method... worked for me.... 9^n ends with 1 for even n and with 9 for odd n... this leaves us with two options 09 and 89... On careful observation.. it can be observed that after 9^1 ending with 09... 9^n ends with 09 next time with n=11... therefore for two digits... the pattern repeats with every 10 numbers..... also 9^9 ends with 89... and 89 ends with 9... therefore... (9^9)^9 must end with 89.... Sorry... but at present level... I don't know the concepts of mod.... so I didn't use it....
Why does "the pattern repeats with every 10 numbers"? You have only observed that the pattern follows for smaller powers of 9 . Are you sure it works for even larger powers of 9 ?
It's not difficult to learn the basics of modular arithmetic, here's the link to guide you through the introduction of modular arithmetic.
As you can see the concept, if we raised 9 by an odd no the last digit is 9, and based on the choices 89 is correct since second digt must not be zero.
Why does your statement holds true?
"As you can see the concept, if we raised 9 by an odd no the last digit is 9"
This is basically an antisolution. You have not figured out why the answer can't be 0 9 either.
See Brian Charlesworth or Otto Brestcher's solution for a proper approach.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since λ ( 1 0 0 ) = 2 0 and λ ( 2 0 ) = 4 , where λ ( n ) is the Carmichael Lambda, we can reduce the top exponent modulo 4, so that 9 9 9 ≡ 9 9 1 = 9 9 ( m o d 1 0 0 ) .
Now 9 × 9 9 = 9 1 0 = 3 2 0 = 3 λ ( 1 0 0 ) ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 0 ) . Multiplying both sides with − 1 1 (the multiplicative inverse of 9 ), we find 9 9 ≡ − 1 1 ≡ 8 9 ( m o d 1 0 0 ) .