Inspired by Jason Dyer

Calculus Level 4

It is known that the harmonic series

1 + 1 2 + 1 3 + 1 4 + 1 5 + 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} +\cdots

diverges. What about if we only took those terms without a 1 in the denominator; does it still diverge?

1 2 + 1 3 + 1 4 + 1 5 + 1 6 + 1 7 + 1 8 + 1 9 + 1 20 + 1 22 + 1 23 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{20} + \frac{1}{22} + \frac{1}{23} + \cdots


Inspiration .

It converges It still diverges

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

This series is K 1 K_{1} of the set of Kempner series , all of which converge.

While a somewhat surprising result, intuitively, as the number of digits in an integer increases, the greater the likelihood that the digit 1 1 will be present, so the number of elements in K 1 K_{1} "thins out" in comparison to the harmonic series, enough so to achieve convergence. From a probability standpoint, as the the number of digits in an integer goes to infinity, the probability that such a number contains a 1 1 goes to 1 1 , and thus the probability that its reciprocal is included in K 1 K_{1} goes to 0 0 .

Using that idea, can you provide an upper bound for the sum?

Chung Kevin - 4 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...