What can we know from this inequality?

Algebra Level 3

a b < c d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{c}{d}

If a , b , c , d a, b, c, d (are real variables that) satisfy the above inequality, what can we say about

a + c b + d ? \frac{a+c}{b+d} ?


Related problem .

a + c b + d < a b < c d \frac{a+c}{b+d} < \frac{a}{b} < \frac{ c}{d} a b < a + c b + d < c d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{a+c}{b+d} < \frac{ c}{d} a b < c d < a + c b + d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{ c}{d} < \frac{a+c}{b+d} None of the rest

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Calvin Lin Staff
Jul 29, 2015
  1. If some of these terms are negative, then it need not be true that a b < a + c b + d < c d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{a+c}{b+d} < \frac{c}{d} . For example,
    2 1 < 1 2 , but 2 1 < 1 2 < 3 1 \frac{2}{-1} < \frac{1}{2}, \text{ but } \frac{2}{-1} < \frac{1}{2} < \frac{ 3 } { 1 }

  2. As pointed out by Julian, if b + d = 0 b+d =0 , then the fraction is undefined.

-2/3 < -1/3 then -2/3 < -3/6 < -1/3 ... If -2/3 < 1/2 then -2/3 < -1/5 < 1/2. Wait I see -2/3 < 1/-3 then -1/0 has no meaning so then Calvin I now will buy what you are selling

Julian Fuller - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

That's a good point, that if b + d = 0 b+d = 0 , then the fraction is undefined!

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 10 months ago

Maybe it could have been explicitly stated that a,b,c,d belong to the set of integers (and not necessarily to the set of whole numbers)

Pavan Kumar Vaitheeswaran - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, they are real numbers, not necessarily integers.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 10 months ago

@Calvin Lin sir, the options given were little ambiguous. Now u asked "what can we say about a + c b + d \frac{a+c}{b+d} ". U should've mentioned " a b < a + c b + d < c d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{a+c}{b+d} < \frac{c}{d} for all a,b,c,d" Then your question would've been clear.

Aditya Kumar - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Isn't that a given? These are variables, and not specific constant that you have chosen.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

ooh i got it

Aditya Kumar - 5 years, 10 months ago

Completely unclear.answer from Calvin and what is more, not valid. For all real values except b and d equal zero, the solution a/b less than (a+c)/(b+d) less than c/d is one and only one correct answer.

Oleg Yovanovich

Oleg Yovanovich - 7 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Hi Oleg, I gave an explicit to the claim that a b < a + c b + d < c d \frac{ a}{b} < \frac{ a+c} { b+d} < \frac{ c}{d} . In particular, we have b d < 0 bd < 0 , which was necessary to create the counterexample.

I believe that you're making the assumption that b d > 0 bd > 0 . I'm guessing that this happened implicitly when you multiplied by the denominator without checking the signs, to claim that a d < b c ad < bc .


Calvin Lin Staff - 7 months, 2 weeks ago
Figel Ilham
Aug 2, 2015

Since there are no boundaries for a , b , c , d a,b,c,d , we may free to assume either the numerators are non-positive (either positives) or denumerators are non-positive (either positives). If the statement will be true on a b < a + c b + d < c d \frac{a}{b} < \frac{a+c}{b+d} < \frac{c}{d} , consider the statement before. b + d b+d may also result to zero and even negatives, so it contradicts the statement.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...