( a − 1 ) × a × ( a + 1 ) = 6 b 2
Clearly, ( a , b ) = ( 2 , 1 ) and ( 3 , 2 ) are solutions because 1 × 2 × 3 = 6 × 1 2 and 2 × 3 × 4 = 6 × 2 2 .
If a and b are positive integers and b ≥ 3 , is there a solution that satisfies the above equation?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Do you know if there are (infinitely) more solutions?
There are several cases of how the "multiples of a perfect square" could line up, and 3 cases correspond to ( x 2 , 2 y 2 , 3 z 2 ) , ( 2 x 2 , 3 y 2 , z 2 ) , ( 3 x 2 , y 2 , 2 z 2 ) . In each of these cases, I cannot yet eliminate other possibilities.
I didn't like the a = 2 , 3 solutions as they were small enough cases for someone to consider when answering this problem. I was wanting to come up with a less trivial variant of this version, but there doesn't really seem to be a nice one.
Log in to reply
I originally answered this by trial and error and got the a = 2 and a = 3 straightaway. I wrote a quick Python computer program and discovered that 2, 3, and 49 are the only solutions for a < 1,000,000 which suggests to me that there are finite solutions, but I do not know if this is true or how to prove it if it is.
I was just about to suggest that the question may be better if it limited a or b to solutions greater than (a, b) = (2, 1) and (a, b) = (3, 2), since (a, b) = (49, 140) is not as obvious, but I see you already did that.
Log in to reply
Here is a link to the article, written in French.
It cites another paper (by the same journal) that deals with
a
−
1
being even leading only to solutions
a
−
1
=
2
,
4
8
.
It then proves the case of
a
−
1
being odd only has solutions when
a
+
1
is a multiple of 3, and even then the only solution requires
a
−
1
=
1
.
According to this Wikipedia article , "A. J. Meyl proved in 1878 that only three tetrahedral numbers are also perfect squares, namely: T 1 = 1 2 = 1 , T 2 = 2 2 = 4 , and T 4 8 = 1 4 0 2 = 1 9 6 0 0 ." I have not been able to find the proof for this, but apparently it is quite long and complex.
Any approach on how to find the solution (49,140)?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
One solution is ( a , b ) = ( 4 9 , 1 4 0 ) , since ( a − 1 ) ⋅ a ⋅ ( a + 1 ) = ( 4 9 − 1 ) ⋅ 4 9 ⋅ ( 4 9 + 1 ) = 1 1 7 6 0 0 and 6 b 2 = 6 ( 1 4 0 ) 2 = 1 1 7 6 0 0 .
Let n = a − 1 . Then n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 6 b 2 and 6 n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = b 2 . Since 6 n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) is the formula for the n t h tetrahedral number, integer solutions for a and b occur when a tetrahedral number is also a square number. According to to this Wikipedia article , "A. J. Meyl proved in 1878 that only three tetrahedral numbers are also perfect squares, namely: T 1 = 1 2 = 1 , T 2 = 2 2 = 4 , and T 4 8 = 1 4 0 2 = 1 9 6 0 0 ." Since a = n + 1 , the only possible solutions occur when a = 1 + 1 = 2 , a = 2 + 1 = 3 , and a = 4 8 + 1 = 4 9 .