1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + ⋯
For a series n = 1 ∑ ∞ a n we define its partial sums s n = k = 1 ∑ n a k , their average values b n = n 1 k = 1 ∑ n s k , and the average values of those, c n = n 1 k = 1 ∑ n b k .
Let's say that the series n = 1 ∑ ∞ a n is Corn summable if n → ∞ lim c n exists. In this case, n → ∞ lim c n is called the Corn sum of the series.
Find the Corn sum of the series 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + ⋯
If you come to the conclusion that no such sum exists, enter 0.666.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes indeed! (+1)
I enjoyed reading your fancy proof of the convergence of c n . I thought of it this way: We know that if a sequence converges to a , then so does its Cesàro average. Consequently, if the even and odd terms of a sequence converge to a and b , respectively, then its Cesàro average will converge to 2 a + b . Applied to b n , with the even terms converging to 0 and the odd ones to 2 1 , we see that lim n → ∞ c n = 4 1
The best reference for this kind of stuff may still be Hardy's "Divergent Series". The relationship between Cesàro and Abel summability is discussed in Section 5.12, Theorems 55 and 56. You are right: Cesàro (or Corn) summability does imply Abel summability, with the same limit (the proof is actually pretty straightforward).
It is interesting that this limit of 4 1 can be obtained by a discrete method. I find this approach more intuitive than the Abel sum, but this may just be a matter of taste.
Again, I want to thank you for bringing up this interesting topic!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As I noted in the solution to the earlier version, we have b 2 m = 0 and b 2 m + 1 = 2 m + 1 m + 1 = 2 1 + 4 m + 2 1 . So c 2 k = 2 k 1 m = 0 ∑ k − 1 ( 2 1 + 4 m + 2 1 ) = 2 k k / 2 + 4 k 1 m = 0 ∑ k − 1 2 m + 1 1 and that second term certainly goes to 0 as k → ∞ , because the sum is less than the harmonic number H k , which is less than ln ( k ) + 1 for sufficiently large k (see Euler-Mascheroni constant for details).
So c 2 k → 1 / 4 as k → ∞ , and c 2 k − 1 = 2 k − 1 2 k c 2 k , so it goes to 1 / 4 as well. So the answer is 0 . 2 5 .
The "Corn sum" just seems to be a ( C , 2 ) Cesaro sum (I think?), and there is some general theorem (that I don't know much about) that if the Cesaro sum exists, then so does the Abel sum, and they're equal. I think this works for higher-order Cesaro sums as well, not just ( C , 1 ) . I might be wrong about this--do you have a good reference, Otto?