Inspired by Calvin and Steven.

True or False:

\ \ \ \ Considering the set of positive integers , since every odd number is followed by an even number and vice-versa, therefore there can be no two consecutive prime numbers .


Inspiration

False True

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Tapas Mazumdar
Mar 22, 2017

The error that most people often commit is to think that every even natural number must be a composite number, since all numbers have the number itself and 1 as a factor (which make up for two factors) and there is a necessity of just one more factor to make them composite, in this case, we have the number 2.

However , the number 2 itself is such an even number that it has only two factors, 1 and itself. Thus, the statement posed in the problem is correct for the fact that

Considering the set of positive integers, every odd number is followed by an even number and vice-versa.

But it is not true that

Thus there are no two consecutive prime numbers.

The only counterexample is this case is the prime pair ( 2 , 3 ) (2,3) .

"Twin primes" are primes separated by just one number, i.e. (101, 103). (2, 3) are known as the Siamese twins.

Denton Young - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

The question asks for consecutive prime numbers, not twin primes (differing by 2)!

Vinayak Srivastava - 1 year ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...