Consider all polynomials f ( x ) with integer coefficients such that f ( 1 ) = 5 , f ( 2 ) = 8 , f ( 3 ) = 1 3 . What is the minimum possible positive value of f ( 4 ) ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Is it taboo to write a solution to a problem that was inspired by a self-proposed problem? :P
Anyway, this problem can still be tackled with a number theoretic approach. Let y = f ( 4 ) . Since f has integer coefficients, we know that y is also an integer. Furthermore, we know that, for all integers a , b , we have a − b ∣ f ( a ) − f ( b ) . Substituting in a = 4 and b = 1 , 2 , 3 gives
3 2 1 ∣ y − 5 ∣ y − 8 ∣ y − 1 3 ,
resulting in the system of congruences
y y ≡ 5 ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 ) ≡ 8 ≡ 0 ( m o d 2 ) .
We can immediately see that y = 2 is the smallest possible positive value of y that satisfies this system. Indeed, f ( x ) = − 3 x 3 + 1 9 x 2 − 3 3 x + 2 2 is a polynomial with integer coefficients such that f ( 4 ) = 2 is satisfied, along with the problem conditions.
I'll also present the algebraic method, which allows us to find a suitable polynomial directly. Notice that f ( x ) = x 2 + 4 holds for x = 1 , 2 , 3 . Therefore, we can factor f ( x ) as
f ( x ) = x 2 + 4 + g ( x ) ( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) ( x − 3 ) ,
for some polynomial g ( x ) with integer coefficients. Plugging in x = 4 yields f ( 4 ) = 2 0 + 6 g ( 4 ) . Since f ( 4 ) ≡ 2 ( m o d 6 ) , we find again that f ( 4 ) = 2 is our smallest positive value of f ( 4 ) . This can be achieved, for example, when g ( x ) = − 3 , which yields the f ( x ) we found in the previous solution.
No, nothing taboo about posting a solution to a problem that was inspired by you.
As an aside, doing the chinese remainder theorem calculations is equivalent to the lagrange interpolation approach, and they are connected by ring theory . IMO, CRT is more complicated/tedious, in part since the final step of sufficiency verification of f ( x ) 's existence requires us to essentially perform interpolation of some type.
Nice! 2 awesome approaches :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
[This is not a complete solution.]
Most people make the mistake that since the polynomial looks like f ( x ) = x 2 + 4 , hence they think the minimum is f ( 4 ) = 4 2 + 4 = 2 0 . How do we know that there isn't a higher-degree polynomial which allows us to minimize f ( 4 ) ?
Hint: The only polynomials with integer coefficients that satisfy f ( 1 ) = 0 are of the form f ( x ) = g ( x ) × ( x − 1 ) , where g ( x ) is a polynomial with integer coefficients.
Hint: The only polynomials with integer coefficients that satisfy f ( 1 ) = 0 , f ( 2 ) = 0 , f ( 3 ) = 0 are of the form f ( x ) = g ( x ) × ( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) ( x − 3 ) , where g ( x ) is a polynomial with integer coefficients.
Hint: Hence classify all polynomials that satisfy the conditions of the problem.
Hint: Hence, determine the minimum possible positive value of f ( n ) .