Integrability

Calculus Level 1

f ( x ) = { 0 if x is rational 1 if x is irrational f(x)=\begin{cases} 0\text{ if } x\text{ is rational}\\\\ 1\text{ if }x\text{ is irrational} \end{cases}

Is the function above Riemann integrable on [ 0 , 1 ] ? [0,1]?
Is it Lebesgue integrable on [ 0 , 1 ] ? [0,1]?

Yes; Yes Yes; No No; Yes No; No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Samir Khan
Jun 21, 2016

Relevant wiki: Lebesgue Integration

The function is not Riemann integrable because the upper and lower sums do not converge, since every interval contains both infinitely many rationals and irrationals. The function is Lebesgue integrable however, because it is a simple function.

Great work! I'd also note that the Lebesgue integral is 1. Intuitively, this is because almost all of the numbers are irrational, so we have f ( x ) = 1 f(x)=1 across almost the whole domain.

More formally, because the rational numbers are countable , and the measure of a countable union of disjoint sets is the sum of the measure of each, μ ( x [ 0 , 1 ] Q ) = 0. \mu(x \in [0,1] \cap \mathbb{Q}) = 0. And since μ ( [ 0 , 1 ] ) = 1 , \mu([0,1]) = 1, we must have μ ( x [ 0 , 1 ] \ Q ) = 1 0 = 1. \mu(x \in [0,1] \backslash \mathbb{Q}) = 1- 0 = 1. Thus, the Lebesgue integral is 0 × 0 + 1 × 1 = 1. 0 \times 0 + 1 \times 1 = 1.

Eli Ross Staff - 4 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

μ(x∈[0,1]∩Q)=0, can you explain it?

afsheen ayub - 1 year, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/889633/measure-of-set-of-rational-numbers

Contour Integral - 4 months ago

Same as @afsheen ayub , can you explain μ(x∈[0,1]∩Q)=0? What is the union you are referring to, it seems like an intersection.

S F - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

Ah, I see you are referring to the union of the set where f(x)=1 and the set where f(x)=0.

S F - 1 year ago

See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/889633/measure-of-set-of-rational-numbers

Contour Integral - 4 months ago

I answered No, Yes e.g. Not Riemann integrable and Lebesgue integrable, which the website said was wrong????

Graham Corke - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

even i got the same response

vidyarthi s - 2 years, 1 month ago

Anther way of viewing could be in the definition itself.As mentioned by Samir Khan,the function is a simple function. If we consider the Rienmann definition,we observe that there are infinitely many domain elements for the given function.This means that the sum cannot be closed under the Rienmann definiton. However as per Lebesgue's defintion,if we divide along the range,we see there are only two possible values of the range for the rational (R) and irrational (C) sets respectively.Thus we obtain a bounded form the function,making it integrable

Arpit das - 10 months, 3 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...