∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + y ) ( 1 + y 6 ) y 2 d y = a π
Find a .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
done in a similar way I feel so proud :V
Log in to reply
Try to do it using y=tan^2 (x) , gives nice integration on simplyfing
Did exactly the same. Nice problem. Keep posting more
is this advance integral?
Let y^3 = tanx Then 1+y^6 = (secx)^2 Also, 3y^2dy=(secx)^2dx. y--->0, tanx--->0, so x--->arctan0=0 y--->inf, tanx--->inf, x---->arctan(inf)=pi/2 Reduce and express resulting expression in terms of sines and cosines. Then use the instructions in the link below https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=489280981275670&id=309749225895514 I hope posting the link here does not violate rules. Otherwise, delete the comment
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Integration Tricks
Here's the solution, but later on I'll discuss the process behind this.
Call our integral I . Substitute y = x 1 (so d y = − x 2 1 d x ) and we get I = ∫ ∞ 0 ( 1 + x 1 ) ( 1 + x 6 1 ) x 2 1 ⋅ ( − x 2 1 ) d x = ∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + x 1 ) ( 1 + x 6 1 ) x 4 1 d x = ∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + x ) ( 1 + x 6 ) x 3 d x .
Note that the bounds changed from ∞ to 0, but we then reversed them back and got rid of a negative sign. Adding this to our original integral, I , gives 2 I = ∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + y ) ( 1 + y 6 ) y 2 + y 3 d y = ∫ 0 ∞ 1 + y 6 y 2 d y . For this addition, it's probably worth showing that the integrals converge, but since they're equal and the sum ends up being finite, let's not worry about this.
Now, substitute u = y 3 (so d u = 3 y 2 d y ) giving 2 I = ∫ 0 ∞ 3 1 ⋅ 1 + u 2 1 d u = 3 1 tan − 1 ( u ) ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 0 ∞ = 3 1 ( 2 π − 0 ) = 6 π . Thus, I = 2 1 ⋅ 6 π = 1 2 π .
If that looks like a bunch of magic (it should!), here's the problem-solving process behind this solution (for me):
I wanted to simplify things, and study related integrals. First, to simplify things for the purposes of exploring, I tried changing y 2 in the numerator to just a 1 . When integrals go from 0 to ∞ , nice things often happen when you “reverse them” by using a x 1 substitution (to go from ∞ to 0); this is especially true with rational functions of polynomials. So, I noticed that this substitution gave the same integral except with y 5 in the numerator instead of 1 . Interesting…
In retrospect, I could have just used the x 1 observation on the integral with y 2 in the numerator, but now I was curious: what happens if I have y k in the numerator? It turns out, via this substitution, that it equals the same integral with y 5 − k in the numerator!
So the y 2 integral equals the y 3 integral, but how does this help? I really hate having two terms in the denominator, and I’d love to get rid of one. Which one? Well…subtracting the integrals makes a numerator of y 3 − y 2 = y 2 ( y − 1 ) which is pretty unhelpful, but y 3 + y 2 = y 2 ( 1 + y ) looks great -- one of the denominator terms will cancel with the numerator if I add the integrals!
The last substitution of u = y 3 is a more typical u -substitution. I don’t want the numerator there, so I try to make it the derivative of something like y 3 . That works nicely, since the denominator is 1 + ( y 3 ) 2 .