Define f ( x ) = ( − 1 ) r − 1 , r + 1 1 < x ≤ r 1 for r = 1 , 2 , 3 . . . and f ( 0 ) = 0 . Find the value of ∫ 0 1 f ( x ) d x . If you think that the function is un-integrable :- enter 1 7 2 9 as your answer.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It is even easier to observe that the function is Lebesgue integrable over ( 0 , 1 ) , since it is the limit of a sequence of step functions uniformly bounded by the constant function 1 . Its integral is then r = 1 ∑ ∞ r ( r + 1 ) ( − 1 ) r − 1 = 2 ln 2 − 1
Log in to reply
Yeah. We can view it from Lebesgue integration point of view to show it is integrable. We can also use the concept of set of measure zero to show the function is riemann integrable.
The function is Lebesgue integrable because it is a simple function (it takes only two values ± 1 )
Log in to reply
Well, because it is a measurable simple function.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The set of discontinuity of f(x) in [ 0 , 1 ] is the countable set S = ( 0 , 2 1 , 3 1 . . . . . . . ) whose set of limit points(derived set) is finite and is infact the singleton set S ′ = ( 0 ) . Hence the function is Riemann Integrable. Now as we can see we can represent ∫ 0 1 f ( x ) d x as an infinite summation .
∫ 0 1 f ( x ) d x = 1 ( 1 − 2 1 ) − 1 ( 2 1 − 3 1 ) + 1 ( 3 1 − 4 1 ) − . . . . . . .
∫ 0 1 f ( x ) d x = ( 1 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + . . . . . . . ) + ( − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + . . . . . . . )
Using the fact that ln ( 2 ) = 1 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + . . . . . . .
we have our answer as 2 ln ( 2 ) − 1