If a , b , c , d are distinct integers in AP such that d = a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ,
then a + b + c + d is :
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I disagree that we can reach the conclusions of (i) and (ii).
What we have is an inequality of specific values, as opposed to an inequality of variables. For example, if we have 1 + 4 ≤ 2 + 3 , does that imply that 1 ≤ 2 and 4 ≤ 3 ?
Even in the event of inequality of variables, we cannot do such a direct comparison. For example, we know that AM-GM tells us a 2 + b 2 ≥ 2 a b . We cannot compare the term a b and conclude that 0 ≥ 2 a b hence 0 ≥ 2 .
Since it is an AP with integers with four terms, a+d = b+c . So a+b+c+d=2(a+d). So the sum can only be even. It can only be 0 or 2. But with sum 0, four integers CAN NOT be in AP. So if the options given contain an answer, it must be 2 .Since the four integer terms sum up to 2, some terms have to be negative. Thus the condition given is not necessary. And even without the given condition, not only we can know their sum (=2), I think there is only one unique solution -1, 0, 1, 2.
sorry for the inconvenience caused!! the previous post was not put by me and i believe that it was hacked...but now its recovered!! @shivansh mittal sorry for the inconvenience caused!!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The given numbers can be represented as b-k, b b+k, b+ 2k where k is the common difference.
So we we can write:
b + 2 k = ( b − k ) 2 + b 2 + ( b + k ) 2
=> b + 2 k = 3 b 2 + 2 k 2
=> b ≤ 3 b 2 -----(i) and 2 k ≤ 2 k 2 ----------(ii)
Solving eq(ii), we get k=0,1
k=0 is rejected since the numbers are distinct. ∴ k=1.
Solving eq(i), we get b=0, 1/3
Since the numbers are integers hence b = 3 1 ∴ b=0.
∴ The numbers a,b,c,d are -1, 0, 1, 2 respectively.
∴ a + b + c + d = 2