Let be a matrix such that for .
Compute .
(Bonus: Prove that it doesn't matter what is)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Following the algorithm given, let's build the rows of A...
row 1: a11 = min{1,1} = 1, a12 = min{1,2} = 1, a13 = min{1,3} = 1 , .... , a1n = min{1,n} = 1 row 2: a21 = min{2,1} = 1, a22= min{2,2} = 2, a23 = min{2,3} = 2, ...., a2n = min{2,n} = 2 . . . row n : a1n = min{1,n} = 1, a2n = min{2,n} = 2, a3n = min{3,n} = 3, ...., ann = min{n, n} = n
So, A loos like this:
|1 1 1 . . . 1 | |1 2 2 . . . 2 | |1 2 3 . . . 3 | |. . . . . . . | |1 2 3 4 ... n|
By row reducing A, we can cancel out the rows in the following fashion:
row(1) * (-1) + row(2) row(1) * (-1) + row(3) ... and do this with all rows, until arriving:
|1 1 .... 1| |0 1 .... 1| |0 0 1 ..1| |............| |0 0 0 ..1|
At this point, we know 2 facts:
(1) row reducing A with the described operations doesn't change the determinant of A. (2) the determinant of the row reduced echelon form of A given above is just the product of the diagonal entries, because it's an upper triangular matrix.
Therefore, det(A) = 1.
For any dimension n, you will arrive at a similar row reduced triangular form with determinant = 1.