Interesting determinant

Let A A be a n × n n \times n matrix such that A i , j = m i n { i , j } A_{i,j} = min\{i,j\} for 1 i , j n 1 \le i,j \le n .

Compute d e t ( A ) det(A) .

(Bonus: Prove that it doesn't matter what n n is)


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Following the algorithm given, let's build the rows of A...

row 1: a11 = min{1,1} = 1, a12 = min{1,2} = 1, a13 = min{1,3} = 1 , .... , a1n = min{1,n} = 1 row 2: a21 = min{2,1} = 1, a22= min{2,2} = 2, a23 = min{2,3} = 2, ...., a2n = min{2,n} = 2 . . . row n : a1n = min{1,n} = 1, a2n = min{2,n} = 2, a3n = min{3,n} = 3, ...., ann = min{n, n} = n

So, A loos like this:

|1 1 1 . . . 1 | |1 2 2 . . . 2 | |1 2 3 . . . 3 | |. . . . . . . | |1 2 3 4 ... n|

By row reducing A, we can cancel out the rows in the following fashion:

row(1) * (-1) + row(2) row(1) * (-1) + row(3) ... and do this with all rows, until arriving:

|1 1 .... 1| |0 1 .... 1| |0 0 1 ..1| |............| |0 0 0 ..1|

At this point, we know 2 facts:

(1) row reducing A with the described operations doesn't change the determinant of A. (2) the determinant of the row reduced echelon form of A given above is just the product of the diagonal entries, because it's an upper triangular matrix.

Therefore, det(A) = 1.

For any dimension n, you will arrive at a similar row reduced triangular form with determinant = 1.

Denton Young
Jan 15, 2020

Since it doesn't matter what n n is, take n = 1 n = 1 .

Then we have a 1 by 1 matrix with a single entry, namely 1, and its determinant is therefore 1.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...