[https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1762871440524943&set=a.104229213055849&type=3&theater)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Please, see also Chris Lewis's solution. This is just a an expansion of it.
∫ 0 ∞ π 2 x 2 + 1 ( n + x sin ( x ) ) 3 d x ⇒ 2 n 3 − 2 3 e − 1 / π π n 2 + 2 3 π n 2 + 4 3 e − 2 / π π 2 n − 4 3 π 2 n + 2 3 π n − 8 1 e − 3 / π π 3 + 8 3 e − 1 / π π 3 − 4 π 3 + 8 3 π
∂ n ∂ ( 2 n 3 − 2 3 e − 1 / π π n 2 + 2 3 π n 2 + 4 3 e − 2 / π π 2 n − 4 3 π 2 n + 2 3 π n − 8 1 e − 3 / π π 3 + 8 3 e − 1 / π π 3 − 4 π 3 + 8 3 π ) ⇒ 2 3 n 2 − 3 e − 1 / π π n + 3 π n + 4 3 e − 2 / π π 2 − 4 3 π 2 + 2 3 π
∂ n ∂ ( 2 3 n 2 − 3 e − 1 / π π n + 3 π n + 4 3 e − 2 / π π 2 − 4 3 π 2 + 2 3 π ) ⇒ 3 n − 3 e − 1 / π π + 3 π
∂ n ∂ ( 3 n − 3 e − 1 / π π + 3 π ) ⇒ 3
Starting with the expansion of the integrand, doing the problem as Chirs Lewis actually did the problem.
π 2 x 2 + 1 n 3 + x ( π 2 x 2 + 1 ) 3 n 2 sin ( x ) + x 2 ( π 2 x 2 + 1 ) 3 n sin 2 ( x ) + x 3 ( π 2 x 2 + 1 ) sin 3 ( x )
π 2 x 2 + 1 3 n 2 + x ( π 2 x 2 + 1 ) 6 n sin ( x ) + x 2 ( π 2 x 2 + 1 ) 3 sin 2 ( x )
π 2 x 2 + 1 6
6 ∫ π 2 x 2 + 1 1 d x ⇒ 6 π tan − 1 ( π x ) ∣ x = 0 x = ∞ ⇒ 6 ( 2 1 − 0 ) ⇒ 3
Added 2019 June 6 1330Z (D-Day 75th anniversary).
The indefinite integral:
4 π 1 ( 4 n sinh ( π 1 ) Ci ( π i − x ) + 4 n sinh ( π 1 ) Ci ( π i + x ) − i cosh ( π 2 ) Ci ( π 2 i + 2 x ) + i cosh ( π 2 ) Ci ( π 2 i − 2 x ) + 4 n 2 tan − 1 ( π x ) + 4 i n cosh ( π 1 ) Si ( π i − x ) + 4 i n cosh ( π 1 ) Si ( π i + x ) + sinh ( π 2 ) Si ( π 2 i + 2 x ) − sinh ( π 2 ) Si ( π 2 i − 2 x ) + 2 tan − 1 ( π x ) )
Assuming that z ∈ R > 0 ∨ ℑ ( z ) = 0 , Ci ( z ) = − ∫ z ∞ t cos ( t ) d t .
Si ( z ) = 2 1 ( π − 2 ∫ z ∞ t sin ( t ) d t ) .
These special functions can be developed by taking the Maclaurin series for the respective trigonometric series, doing the division by t and doing the integration from z to infinity on each term individually and then reassembling the new series. This is done for otherwise undoable integrations.
Evaluating the indefinite integral at 0 gives:
4 π − 8 n Shi ( π 1 ) cosh ( π 1 ) + 8 Ci ( π i ) n sinh ( π 1 )
Evaluating the indefinite integral at ∞ gives:
4 π 2 π n 2 + 4 i π n sinh ( π 1 ) + π + π sinh ( π 2 ) − π cosh ( π 2 )
The point is: this is unnecessary! See Chris Lewis’s much simpler solution.
How did you evaluate the integral in the first place????
I added material to my explanation.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This is an application of Leibniz's rule - ie, differentiating under the integral sign (a favourite trick of Richard Feynman, no less!)
As it stands, the integral looks (and is) pretty horrific. The trick is to differentiate wrt n first ; the integrand is a cubic polynomial in n , so its third derivative is just 6 times the coefficient of n 3 in the integrand.
The integral we actually need is I = ∫ 0 ∞ 1 + π 2 x 2 6 d x which can easily be worked out (the indefinite integral is just an inverse tangent) to be 3 .