Invertibility

Algebra Level 3

Let M M be a n × n n \times n matrix with no invertible matrix X X such that X 1 M X = I n X^{-1} M X = I_n . Is M M necessarily not invertible?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Otto Bretscher
Nov 15, 2018

If X 1 M X = I n X^{-1}MX=I_n then M = I n M=I_n (multiply with X X from the left and with X 1 X^{-1} from the right). Thus, any invertible M I n M\neq I_n is a counterexample.

Hobart Pao
Nov 15, 2018

Let M = ( 1 0 0 1 ) M = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} . Since tr M = 0 \text{tr }M= 0 , by the invariance of trace under conjugation, there is no invertible matrix X X such that X 1 M X = I n X^{-1} M X = I_n . But M M is clearly invertible.

Any triangular square matrix such that two or more element on the diagonal are the same is a counterexample. Such matrices are invertible. But, the eigenvector matrices of them are not invertible, which makes the original matrices not diagonalizable.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...