is an irrational number less than .
It's decimal representation has an infinite number of sevens but a finite number of the remaining nine digits.
Is this possible?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We show that any such s must be rational.
Note that 0 . n 0 s 0 … 0 7 = 9 ⋅ 1 0 n 7 is a rational number. If s has a finite number of non-seven digits, there must be a rightmost non-seven digit. Say this occurs at the n th decimal place. Then, every decimal place to the right of the n th place must be a seven. So we can write s = k + 0 . n 0 s 0 … 0 7 = k + 9 ⋅ 1 0 n 7 where k < 1 has n decimal digits. Since the decimal representation of k terminates, it is a rational number and, as the sum of rationals, s must also be rational.