Irrational power

Let i 1 i_1 and i 2 i_2 be irrational numbers, can i 1 i 2 i_1^{i_2} be rational?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Let i 1 i_1 and i 2 i_2 be irrational numbers. Then we want to know if it is possible that i 1 i 2 i_1^{i_2} is rational. Let's try i 1 = i 2 = 2 i_1 = i_2 = \sqrt{2} : is 2 2 \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} rational? We don't know, but if it is, the problem is solved. If it is not, then take i 1 = 2 2 i_1 = \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} and i 2 = 2 i_2 = \sqrt{2} . Then

i 1 i 2 = ( 2 2 ) 2 = 2 2 2 = 2 2 = 2 , i_1^{i_2} = \left( \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} \right)^{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{2}^{2} = 2,

is certainly rational, which makes possible to take an irrational number to the power of an irrational number and have as result a rational number.

In fact \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2} is irrational. This is a consequence of the Gelfond-Schneider Theorem, which says that if a , b a,b are algebraic numbers with a 2 a a^2 \neq a and if b b irrational, then a b a^b is transcendental.

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 4 months ago

This is simply beautiful

Stephen Mellor - 3 years, 4 months ago
Will van Noordt
Jan 11, 2018

Let i 1 = e i_1 = e and i 2 = ln ( q ) i_2 = \ln(q) where q Q q \in \mathbb{Q} . Then, i 1 i 2 = e ln ( q ) = q Q i_1^{i_2} = e^{\ln(q)} = q \in \mathbb{Q} .

Nicely done! We know that if q Q q \in \mathbb{Q} then ln ( q ) \ln(q) is irrational. But can you prove it?

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Suppose ln ( q ) Q \ln(q) \in \mathbb{Q} , then for coprime nonzero integers m m and n n , then ln ( q ) = m n \ln(q) = \frac{m}{n} . This implies that e m n = q e^{\frac{m}{n}} = q , or, raising both sides to the n t h n^{th} power, e m = q n Q e^m = q^n \in \mathbb{Q} . We know that e e is transcendental, so therefore, for nonzero integers m m , e m I e^{m} \in \mathbb{I} , contradicting e m Q e^{m} \in \mathbb{Q} . Therefore, ln ( q ) I \ln(q) \in \mathbb{I} .

Will van Noordt - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

I should clarify: if e m Q e^m \in \mathbb{Q} , then for nonzero coprime integers p p and q q , e m = p q e^m = \frac{p}{q} , or equivalently, q e m p = 0 qe^m-p = 0 , which would imply that e e is a root of the integer-coefficient polynomial q x m p = 0 qx^m-p = 0 , contradicting the fact that e e is transcendental, so e m I e^m \in \mathbb{I} .

Will van Noordt - 3 years, 4 months ago
Michael Boyd
Dec 1, 2018

By definition, irrational numbers are members of the set complementary to rational numbers, thus e, i=√(-1), and π are all irrational. π*i is also irrational, however, e^(πi)=-1, which is rational.

1 pending report

Vote up reports you agree with

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...