Let ( x , y ) be the solution of the following system of equations:
{ ( 2 x ) ln 2 = ( 3 y ) ln 3 3 ln x = 2 ln y
What is x ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Hm, I don't quite see how (2) only yields those 2 cases to consider. Doesn't x = 1 , y = 1 also satisfy the condition?
Sorry, I was too eager to fix a solution. My solution revised.
Log in to reply
Yes, this looks much better.
Note that you also need to show that the exponent ln 2 − ln 2 ln 2 3 is non-zero, in order to conclude that x = 2 1 .
(2x)^ln 2 = (3y)^ln 3
log(2x)^ln 2 = log(3y)^ln3
ln 2 . log(2x) = ln 3. log(3y)
this equation will get satisfied when x and y will be zero
therefore
log (2x)=0
implies that
2x = 1 (taking antilog )
therefore x=1/2
similarly y = 1/3
now it's time to solve other equation
3^ln x = 2^ln y
taking log on both side
log 3^ln x = log 2^ln y
ln x. log 3 = ln y .log 2
putting value of x and y
log 1/2 . log 3 = ln 1/3 . log 2
ln 2^-1 . log 3 = ln 3^-1 . log 2
-ln 2 . log 3 = -ln 3. log 2
(because log a ^n = n log a ) both side are equal the value of x
there fore x = 1/2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
{ ( 2 x ) ln 2 = ( 3 y ) ln 3 3 ln x = 2 ln y ⇒ x ln 3 = y ln 2 . . . ( 1 ) . . . ( 2 )
( 1 ) : 2 ln 2 x ln 2 ⇒ x ln 2 − ln 2 ( ln 3 ) 2 ⇒ x = 2 ln 2 ln 3 ˙ ln 3 y ln 2 ln 2 ln 3 = 2 ln 2 ( ln 3 ) 2 x ln 2 ( ln 3 ) 2 = 2 ln 2 ( ln 3 ) 2 − ln 2 = ( 2 1 ) ln 2 − ln 2 ( ln 3 ) 2 = 2 1