Is it a unique solution?

Geometry Level 2

Given a vertex, the orthocenter, and the circumcenter of a triangle--all of which are distinct points--is the triangle uniquely defined?

Yes No Cannot be determined

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Mark Hennings
Apr 6, 2018

Choosing a coordinate system so that the circumcentre is at the origin, if the position vectors of A , B , C A,B,C are a , b , c \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c} respectively, then we know a \mathbf{a} and a + b + c \mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c} , and so we know b + c \mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c} . Since a = b = c = R |\mathbf{a}| = |\mathbf{b}| = |\mathbf{c}|= R is known, b c \mathbf{b}-\mathbf{c} must be perpendicular to b + c \mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c} . Since A A is not the orthocentre, b + c 0 \mathbf{b} + \mathbf{c} \neq \mathbf{0} .

If e \mathbf{e} is a unit vector perpendicular to b + c \mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c} ( e \mathbf{e} is unique to within a choice of sign), then b = 1 2 ( b + c ) + λ e c = 1 2 ( b + c ) λ e \mathbf{b} \; = \; \tfrac12(\mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c}) + \lambda\mathbf{e} \hspace{2cm} \mathbf{c} \; = \; \tfrac12(\mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c}) - \lambda\mathbf{e} for some λ \lambda . Since b \mathbf{b} and c \mathbf{c} both have length R R , we deduce that 1 4 b + c 2 + λ 2 = R 2 \tfrac14|\mathbf{b}+\mathbf{c}|^2 + \lambda^2 \; = \; R^2 which determines λ \lambda to within a sign. Thus B B and C C are determined to within labelling (which point is B B and which C C ). The triangle is uniquely determined.

Dhvanit Beniwal
Jun 20, 2018

Let O denote circumcenter, R denote circumradius and H denote orthocenter of ∆ABC. Given OA, we can uniquely draw the circumcicle. AH is well known to be (2RcosA). Given AH and R, cos A has a unique value and therefore Angle A has unique value. Corresponding to this angle, the LENGTH of chord that subtends it (BC) is unique. Now AH must be perpendicular to BC.This leaves only one unique position for BC and hence the ∆ABC is uniquely defined.

Akeel Howell
Apr 5, 2018

Consider the following two cases:

Case 1. The triangle is scalene.

The side opposite the given vertex is perpendicular to the line through the orthocenter and the given vertex, and also to the line through the circumcenter and the midpoint of this side. The median through this side's midpoint passes through the given vertex and so it suffices to say that the the triangle is uniquely defined.

Case 2: The triangle is isosceles.

Here, the side opposite the given vertex is perpendicular to the Euler line, but there is an infinite set of lines that are perpendicular to the Euler line. With only the orthocenter and the circumcenter, there is not much more that can be said. If however, we consider the centroid of the triangle, then we see that only one pair of points satisfy the conditions that the line segment from one to the other is bisected perpendicularly by the Euler line, and the average of their coordinates with those of the given vertex results in the coordinates of the centroid. Equilateral triangles have circumcenters and orthocenters at the same point so there is no need for a third case.

Hence, any triangle is uniquely defined by these three points.

Any three non collinear points determine a triangle

The points given are not vertices so they don’t necessarily determine a unique triangle. For instance, if I gave you the circumcenter, orthocenter, and centroid of some triangle, there is an infinite set of triangles with these points in the given locations.

Akeel Howell - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, but that is because those points are collinear. They lie on the Euler line

Juan Eduardo Ynsil Alfaro - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Not necessarily. If you know the location of an incenter, a circumcenter and a vertex, which are generally a noncollinear triplet, there is an infinite set of triangles with their incenters, circumcenters, and a vertex at these respective points. You can see this by picking any two points as these triangle centers and a third point as a vertex. If you construct two line segments from the vertex such that the angle bisector passes through the incenter, you can extend or shorten both of them until their perpendicular bisectors pass through the circumcenter. Connecting the endpoints of these two line segments by a third gives one triangle that satisfies your criterion. Now if you repeat this process with a different angle at the known vertex, you obtain a different triangle. You can quickly see that there is an infinite set of triangles with these three points, regardless of the fact that they are non-collinear.

Also, note that there are cases where three collinear points define a unique triangle. Like a circumcenter, an orthcenter, and a vertex lying on the Euler line. This collinear triplet of points defines a unique isosceles triangle, provided it’s a non-right triangle.

Akeel Howell - 3 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...