Is it bigger than a googol?

192021222 919293 \large 192021222\ldots 919293

The number above is formed by concantenating the positive integers from 19 to 93 inclusive.

If a a is the largest integer that such that 3 a 3^a divides the number described above, find the value of a a .


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

WARNING : This solution is a bit weird , viewer discretion is advised.

First, notice that 19202122...919293 = n = 19 93 n 100 93 n 19202122...919293 = \sum _{ n=19 }^{ 93 }{ n\ast { 100 }^{ 93-n } } .

Second, also notice that 100 x 1 ( m o d 9 ) , x N { 100 }^{ x }\equiv 1(mod\quad 9),\forall x\in N . Thus, n 100 93 n n 1 n ( m o d 9 ) ( 19 n 93 ) n\ast { 100 }^{ 93-n }\equiv n\ast 1\equiv n\quad (mod\quad 9)\quad (19\le n\le 93) .

Combining both two, 19202122...919293 n = 19 93 n 100 93 n n = 19 93 n 4200 6 ( m o d 9 ) 19202122...919293 \equiv \sum _{ n=19 }^{ 93 }{ n\ast { 100 }^{ 93-n } } \equiv \sum _{ n=19 }^{ 93 }{ n } \equiv 4200\equiv 6\quad (mod\quad 9) .

So, 19202122...919293 19202122...919293 is not divisible by 9, and using the same method, 19202122...919293 19202122...919293 is divisible by 3. Hence, the answer is a = 1 a=1

Actually, we have 3 a = 3 3^a=3 i.e., a = 1 a=1 . I believe you have a typo in your last sentence.

EDIT: I see that the typo has been fixed. Thanks.


By the way, there's actually a much simpler way using the divisibility rules of 3 3 and 9 9 . Denote the given value by x x and its digit sum as σ ( x ) \sigma(x) . We have,

σ ( x ) = ( 1 + 9 ) + ( 2 + 0 ) + + ( 9 + 2 ) + ( 9 + 3 ) = ( 1 + 9 ) + [ k = 2 8 j = 0 9 ( k + j ) ] + ( 9 + 0 ) + ( 9 + 1 ) + ( 9 + 2 ) + ( 9 + 3 ) = 52 + k = 2 8 j = 0 9 ( k + j ) = 52 + k = 2 8 ( 10 k + 45 ) = 717 \begin{aligned}\sigma(x)&=(1+9)+(2+0)+\ldots +(9+2)+(9+3)\\&=(1+9)+\left[\sum_{k=2}^8\sum_{j=0}^9 (k+j)\right]+(9+0)+(9+1)+(9+2)+(9+3)\\&=52+\sum_{k=2}^8\sum_{j=0}^9 (k+j)=52+\sum_{k=2}^8(10k+45)=717\end{aligned}

The last few equalities follows by elementary summation identities and sum of first n n positive integers formula.

All you have to do now is to simply show that 3 717 3\mid 717 but 9 ∤ 717 9\not\mid 717 to conclude your answer by virtue of divisibility rules of 3 3 and 9 9 . This is trivial and is left as an exercise to the interested reader.

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you for your solution. It's actually pretty nice and also neater than my solution :)

Trung Đặng Đoàn Đức - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Your solution is pretty neat too. Upvoted! :)

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...