Does the condition imply x = y ?
x + x 6 = y + y 6
⇕
x = y
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Wow - very clever!
Let x + x 6 = y + y 6 = k .
Then x = 2 k ± k 2 − 2 4 , y = 2 k ± k 2 − 2 4
So, there are two possibilities :
(i) x = y = 2 k + k 2 − 2 4
or x = y = 2 k − k 2 − 2 4
(ii) x = 2 k + k 2 − 2 4 ,
y = 2 k − k 2 − 2 4 ,
x = y
Or, x = 2 k − k 2 − 2 4 ,
y = 2 k + k 2 − 2 4 ,
x = y .
x x 2 + 6 = y y 2 + 6 y x 2 + 6 y = x y 2 + 6 x y x 2 − x y 2 = 6 x − 6 y y x ( x − y ) = 6 ( x − y ) If x = y : y x = 6 , so the number of solutions ∞ . If x = y : 0 = 0 , so the number of solutions ∞ .
Log in to reply
Set any value of k ≥ 2 4 , you will get a set of solutions for x and y . So obviously there are infinite solutions, both for x = y and x = y .
Log in to reply
Yes, you are right. I posted my solution there, because when I solved this problem the answer was bad.
6 + 6 6 = 1 + 1 6 but 6 = 1 .
The first equation can be rearranged to x y 2 − ( x 2 + 6 ) y + 6 x = 0 , which by the quadratic equation leads to y = 2 x ( x 2 + 6 ) ± ( x 2 − 6 ) , which is y = x or y = x 6 .
Using the second solution, some counter-examples (in the form of ( x , y ) ) to show that x and y are not necessarily equal are ( 1 , 6 ) , ( 2 , 3 ) , ( 3 , 2 ) , ( 6 , 1 ) , etc.
I solved it, but chose Can't be determined. I wish to know if my thinking is correct:
Taking x , y = 0 ,
x + x 6 = y + y 6
x − y = y 6 − x 6
x − y = x y 6 ( x − y )
If x − y = 0 ,
then the equation is satisfied.
If x − y = 0 , then it becomes
x y 6 = 1
x y = 6
then also equation is satisfied.
⟹ x = y is not necessary.
Log in to reply
Yes, it looks to me like that reasoning is correct.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Because f ( x ) = x + x 6 is similar to g ( x ) = x 6 when x is small and tends to h ( x ) = x when x tends to infinity, we can graph f as follows:
f is in green and its asymptote h ( x ) = x is the blue line. Given that graph, it is clear that, although (and by definition), one given input of f will have at most one output, the inverse isn't true. In other words, one output of f can have two inputs:
Here L = 1 0 (in red) intersects f ( x ) at x = 5 − 1 9 and x = 5 + 1 9 .
Hence, x + x 6 = y + y 6 does not imply x = y .