∫ 1 ∞ x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 d x
If the integral above can be expressed as c π a − b , where a , b , c are all positive integers, find a + b + c .
Notations:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I do not understand what you have done after the last summation.. somefunction(2) = pi square/6. Could you pls explain what that function is and how you got that sum as pi square/6?
Log in to reply
I have added some explanation and a reference. Hope it is helpful. It is in fact the Basel problem that was first solved by Leonhard Euler .
how did u got integration of 1/[x]^2 from 0 to infinity ?
Log in to reply
1 ∫ ∞ [ x ] 2 1 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n ∫ n + 1 [ x ] 2 1 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n ∫ n + 1 n 2 1 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 = 6 π .
It's the value of reimann zeta function for s=2
I did the same way.
x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 = x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 { x } ( 2 x − { x } ) = x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 { x } ( x + ( x − { x } ) ) = x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 ( x − ⌊ x ⌋ ) ( x + ⌊ x ⌋ ) = x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 x 2 − ⌊ x ⌋ 2 = ⌊ x ⌋ 2 1 − x 2 1 Hence we evaluate the integral as = ∫ 1 ∞ ⌊ x ⌋ 2 1 d x − ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 1 d x = ( ∫ 1 2 1 2 1 d x + ∫ 2 3 2 2 1 d x ⋯ ⋯ ) − ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 1 d x = ( 1 2 1 + 2 2 1 + 3 2 1 ⋯ ⋯ ) − 1 = 6 π 2 − 1 = 6 π 2 − 6
Enjoyed this problem. Having never solved an integral involving either { x } or [ x ] , my approach is probably naive, but thought I would upload it for three reasons:
Here goes:
∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ n n + 1 x 2 [ x ] 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 1 ( x + n ) 2 n 2 2 ( x + n ) x − x 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 ∫ 0 1 x 2 + 2 n x + n 2 x 2 + 2 n x d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 ∫ 0 1 1 − x 2 + 2 n x + n 2 n 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 ∫ 0 1 1 − n 2 ( x + n ) − 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 [ x + x + n n 2 ] 0 1 = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 ( 1 + n + 1 n 2 − 0 − n n 2 ) = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 ( n + 1 ) 1
And at this point I resorted to Wolfram Alpha because I was in too much of a hurry to check if my approach had been error-free and successful.
This gave me:
6 π 2 − 6
So a + b + c = 2 + 6 + 6 = 1 4 .
Thanks for reading and well done if you followed even some of it! If anyone can suggest a non-Wolfram approach to the final integral, I'd be grateful.
Very neat solution! You might enjoy reading this article .
But, can you justify the interchanging of the summation and the integral in the first? Hint: Fubini's theorem.
For the final sum, you can break it up via partial fraction decompositions , to get
n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 ( n + 1 ) 1 = n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 2 1 + n + 1 1 − n 1 ) = = ζ ( 2 ) = π 2 / 6 n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 + = − 1 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n + 1 1 − n 1 ) = 6 π 2 − 6 ,
where the latter sum can be expressed as a telescoping series , n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( a n + 1 − a n ) = N → ∞ lim n = 1 ∑ N ( a n + 1 − a n ) = N → ∞ lim ( a N + 1 − a 1 ) = 0 − 1 = − 1 .
Log in to reply
Thank you. Should have thought have partial fractions! (-:
Yeah at first i kept thinking how to do it, but suddenly it struck me to do so by creating a general term for nth integral and then applying summation.
(Oh just realized Pi Han made a similar remark, so ignore.)
If by "final integral" you actually mean "final summation", then observe that by Partial Fractions ,
n 2 ( n + 1 ) 1 = n 2 1 + n + 1 1 − n 1 .
Hence by the telescoping approach, the sum is ( ∑ n 2 1 ) − 1 .
Log in to reply
Thanks! Very helpful. And, yes - I've changed it to read "final summation". (-:
∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 ( 2 x − { x } ) { x } d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 ( x + x − { x } ) { x } d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 ( x + [ x ] ) { x } d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 ( x + [ x ] ) ( x − [ x ] ) d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 [ x ] 2 x 2 − [ x ] 2 d x
= ∫ 1 ∞ [ x ] 2 1 − x 2 1 d x
Then it is a easy form .First part will give 6 π 2 and second part will give − 1
Can you explain how the 1st part gives pi square by 6
The idea is: We don't want to deal with { x } so we utilize : { x } = x − ⌊ x ⌋
by doing some algebra, we would get: ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 x 2 − ⌊ x ⌋ 2
make it up into two integral:
∫ 1 ∞ 1 / ⌊ x ⌋ 2 d x and ∫ 1 ∞ 1 / x 2 d x
the second part is easy.
for the first part, imagine it in terms of area, you would have blocks with height of 1, 1/4, 1/9, 1/16, 1/25, ... and width of 1.
This is famously equal to π 2 / 6 (read : Riemann zeta function)
thus the integral result will be π 2 / 6 − 1 .
∴ a + b + c = 1 4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Riemann Zeta Function
I = ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 ⌊ x ⌋ 2 2 x { x } − { x } 2 d x = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ k k + 1 k 2 x 2 2 x ( x − k ) − ( x − k ) 2 d x = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ k k + 1 k 2 x 2 2 x 2 − 2 k x − x 2 + 2 k x − k 2 d x = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ k k + 1 k 2 x 2 x 2 − k 2 d x = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ k k + 1 ( k 2 1 − x 2 1 ) d x = k = 1 ∑ ∞ [ k 2 x + x 1 ] k k + 1 = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( k 2 k + 1 − k + k + 1 1 − k 1 ) = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( k 2 1 + k + 1 1 − k 1 ) = ζ ( 2 ) − 1 1 = 6 π 2 − 1 = 6 π 2 − 6 Note that { x } = x − ⌊ x ⌋ Note that k = 1 ∑ ∞ k 2 1 = ζ ( 2 ) = 6 π 2 where ζ ( ⋅ ) denotes the Riemann zeta function.
⟹ a + b + c = 2 + 6 + 6 = 1 4