Does the number which is obtained by writing successively all the integers, a rational number?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Assume that the decimal 0 . 1 2 3 4 . . . . is periodic, that n is the periodicity(number of digits in a period), and that k is the number of digits encountered before the period position starts. Consider the integer 1 0 m , where m is not less than n + k . In composing the decimal we wrote in succession all the integers; hence any chosen number N will appear somewhere. Since in the sequence of numbers written in to make up the infinite decimal m ≥ n + k zeros must be encountered, it follows that the only possible period consists of one zero- a situation that does not hold for this decimal. Hence the decimal is not periodic.