Is the Motion Simple Harmonic? - 2

The natural length of the spring is a a . One end of the spring is attached to a fixed platform (indicated in red) while the other is attached to a point mass constrained to move on a horizontal rail. The mass is given a small initial displacement of x o x_o to the right from its equilibrium position and is then released. The system is placed in a gravity-free environment.

The following claim is made: " The resulting motion of the system is not simple harmonic".

Is the claim true or false?

Note:

  • x o < < a x_o <<a

  • This problem is not original.

Bonus: If your answer is false, compute the natural frequency of small oscillations.

Cannot say False True

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Steven Chase
Dec 19, 2020

The Lagrangian for this system is:

L = 1 2 m x ˙ 2 1 2 k ( a 2 + x 2 a ) 2 L = \frac{1}{2} m \dot{x}^2 - \frac{1}{2} k \Big( \sqrt{a^2 + x^2} - a \Big)^2

The equation of motion is:

d d t L x ˙ = L x \frac{d}{dt } \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot{x}}} = \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{x}}

Evaluating results in:

m x ¨ = k x ( 1 a a 2 + x 2 ) m \ddot{x} = - k x \Big(1 - \frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2 + x^2}} \Big)

Taylor series approximation for small x x :

a 2 + x 2 a + x 2 2 a \sqrt{a^2 + x^2} \approx a + \frac{x^2 }{2 a}

Plugging into the previous expression and simplifying results in:

m x ¨ k x ( x 2 2 a 2 + x 2 ) k x 3 2 a 2 m \ddot{x} \approx - k x \Big(\frac{x^2}{2 a^2 + x^2} \Big) \approx -\frac{k x^3}{2 a^2}

Using small- x x approximations, the double-dot term is proportional to the cube of the displacement. Thus, the expression does not represent SHM.

Hehe nice one. This kinda reminds me of this problem: https://brilliant.org/problems/advanced-spring-problem-from-serway-and-jewett/?ref_id=1586946

Is the motion also not SHM in this case?

Krishna Karthik - 5 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

It looks like essentially the same problem, so I suppose it is not SHM in that case either

Steven Chase - 5 months, 3 weeks ago

@Steven Chase @Krishna Karthik Happy new year guys

Talulah Riley - 5 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Happy new year to you as well

Steven Chase - 5 months, 1 week ago

@Talulah Riley Hey, you're back! Happy new year mate. Good to see you again.

Krishna Karthik - 5 months, 1 week ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...