Suppose f : R → R is a function given by: f ( x ) = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 e x 1 0 − 1 + ( x − 1 ) 2 sin ( x − 1 1 ) , x = 1 x = 1 Evaluate 1 0 1 ( n → ∞ lim [ 1 0 0 n − n k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ] )
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Say, L = n → ∞ lim [ 1 0 0 n − n k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ]
Notice that, L = n → ∞ lim [ 1 0 0 n − n k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ] = n → ∞ lim n ⋅ [ 1 0 0 − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ] = n → ∞ lim ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n 1 1 0 0 − ∑ k = 1 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤ . Since, f ( 1 ) = 1 ,therefore, 1 0 0 = ∑ k = 1 1 0 0 1 = ∑ k = 1 1 0 0 f ( 1 ) .
So, L = n → ∞ lim ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n 1 ∑ k = 1 1 0 0 f ( 1 ) − ∑ k = 1 1 0 0 f ( 1 + n k ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤ = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n 1 f ( 1 ) − f ( 1 + n k ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤ = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n k f ( 1 ) − f ( 1 + n k ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤
= − n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n k f ( 1 + n k ) − f ( 1 ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤ .
Since, the summation variable k has nothing to do with n , therefore, it is legitimate to take limit inside summation. Doing so would yield : L = − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ n → ∞ lim ⎣ ⎢ ⎡ n k f ( 1 + n k ) − f ( 1 ) ⎦ ⎥ ⎤ .
Now, notice that k ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 , . . , 1 0 0 } , i.e k is finite. Thus, as n → ∞ , n k → 0 . Hence,
L = − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ t → 0 lim [ t f ( 1 + t ) − f ( 1 ) ] , where n k = t .
Notice that, t → 0 lim [ t f ( 1 + t ) − f ( 1 ) ] appears to be f ′ ( 1 ) . It can be ascertained that f ′ ( 1 ) does exist and is equal to 1 0 .
So, L = − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ t → 0 lim [ t f ( 1 + t ) − f ( 1 ) ] = − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ f ′ ( 1 ) = − k = 1 ∑ 1 0 0 k ⋅ 1 0 .
Therefore, L = − 1 0 ⋅ 2 ( 1 0 0 ) ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) = − 5 0 5 0 0 .
Hence, 1 0 L = − 5 0 5 0 .