It's Green

The distance between any two adjacent cars at a red light is 2 meters.

As soon as the light turns green, the first car starts accelerating at 4 m / s 2 . \SI{4}{m/s^2}. As soon as the first car reaches a speed of 6 m / s , \SI{6}{m/s}, the second car starts accelerating at the same rate. In exactly the same fashion, each successive car starts accelerating when the car in front of it reaches 6 m / s , \SI{6}{m/s}, and accelerates at 4 m / s 2 \SI{4}{m/s^2} until it reaches the speed 20 m / s . \SI{20}{m/s}.

When all cars have reached the same speed 20 m / s , \SI{20}{m/s}, how far apart are two adjacent cars (in meters)?


The answer is 32.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

13 solutions

Arjen Vreugdenhil
Apr 18, 2018

Relevant wiki: One Dimensional Kinematics: Motion Along a Straight Line

Let t = 0 t = 0 when the first car begins to move, and t t^\star is some time after the second car reaches the maximum speed.

During this time interval, the cars move in similar ways. The only differences are that the second car begins with 1.5 s \SI{1.5}{s} standing still (waiting for the first car to move), and spending 1.5 s \SI{1.5}{s} less time moving at the speed limit. Therefore the difference in distance traveled is Δ x = 1.5 s × 20 m / s = 30 m . \Delta x = \SI{1.5}{s}\times \SI{20}{m/s} = \SI{30}{m}. Add this to the original 2 m \SI{2}{m} between the cars, and you find the final distance to be 32 m \boxed{\SI{32}{m}} .


For those who want to make a more detailed analysis:

t v 1 v 2 x 1 x 2 Δ t Δ v 1 Δ v 2 Δ x 1 Δ x 2 0 0 0 0 2 1.5 6 0 4.5 0 1.5 6 0 4.5 2 3.5 14 14 45.5 24.5 5.0 20 14 50 22.5 1.5 0 6 30 25.5 6.5 20 20 80 48 6.5 20 20 80 50 \begin{array}{c|cc|cc|c|cc|cc} \hline t & v_1 & v_2 & x_1 & x_2 & \Delta t & \Delta v_1 & \Delta v_2 & \Delta x_1 & \Delta x_2 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -2 & & & & & \\ & & & & & 1.5 & 6 & 0 & 4.5 & 0 \\ 1.5 & 6 & 0 & 4.5 & -2 & & & & & \\ & & & & & 3.5 & 14 & 14 & 45.5 & 24.5 \\ 5.0 & 20 & 14 & 50 & 22.5 & & & & & \\ & & & & & 1.5 & 0 & 6 & 30 & 25.5 \\ 6.5 & 20 & 20 & 80 & 48 & & & & & \\ \hline & & & & & 6.5 & 20 & 20 & 80 & 50 \\ \hline \end{array}

@Arjen Vreugdenhil nice solution.

Anand Badgujar - 3 years, 1 month ago

Its so nice that we get 3 tries on numerical solutions. Same reasoning but first try 30. No!? What did I overlook? Ah the 2m extra. Thanks.

Jeremy Galvagni - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I forgot it too and still was wondering.... What? Until I read discussion haha. Than I was like... You fool!

Peter van der Linden - 3 years, 1 month ago

How did you get 1.5s?

David Bose - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Because you are accelerating to a velocity of 6 m/s at rate of 4m/s^2, which takes approx. one and a half seconds. So it takes the first car in line 1.5 seconds to get to the speed at which the next car in line is allowed to start accelerating.

Alan Laifer - 3 years, 1 month ago

What are the make and models of the cars? are the same? are the weights and loads the same? This question is moot.

Henry Segura - 3 years, 1 month ago

X2 = 43.5 m at t = 6.5 s ( " X2(t) = 2t² - 6t - 2 " / " V2(t) = 4t - 6 " ) ( V2(1.5s) = 0 m/s and X2 ( 1.5) = -2 m ) What did I do wrong ?

Ayman Sossi - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

2 ( 1.5 ) 2 6 1.5 2 = 6.5 2\cdot (1.5)^2 - 6\cdot 1.5 - 2 = -6.5 , not 2 -2 .

The correct equation would be x 2 ( t ) = 2 t 2 6 t + 2.5 x_2(t) = 2t^2 - 6t + 2.5 , so that x 2 ( 6.5 ) = 2 ( 6.5 ) 2 6 6.5 + 2.5 = 48. x_2(6.5) = 2\cdot (6.5)^2 - 6\cdot 6.5 + 2.5 = 48.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 1 month ago

for all I know the first car can be reaching the 6m/s for the next 20 years...

Mateusz Korcz - 3 years, 1 month ago

If the acceleration is 4m/sec^2, then the rate of acceleration is equal to 4t. the velocity at a time t would be 2t^2. The point where the first car reaches 6m/s would be where 6=2t^2, or 3^.5. this would give a distance at the terminal speed of 20m/s of approx 36.6 meters. the answer is not an integer, or 36 or 37 should be accepted. Or is acceleration really linear?

Trea Dmill - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

The velocity at time t t would be equal to v = 4 t v = 4t .

The position at time t t would be equal to x = 2 t 2 x = 2t^2 .

The car reaches a velocity of 6 m/s when 6 = 4 t 6 = 4t , or t = 1.5 t = 1.5 . Your calculation 6 = 2 t 2 6 = 2t^2 determines when the car reaches position 6 m.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 1 month ago
Laszlo Mihaly
Apr 19, 2018

Here is a graphical illustration of Arjen's solution. The green curve is identical to the red curve, but shifted by 1.5s and 2m.

Great graphic but you make a mistake you put the 1.5 between the sec. 5.5 and 7 but the case occurs in seconds 5 and 6.5 ✌

CARLITOS MORENO - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

It does not matter where I put the arrow on the graph. The displacement along the time axis between the two graphs is always 1.5s, independent of what time you are looking at.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years, 1 month ago

It's easier to see from the velocity time graph. You just calculate the difference between the distance travelled by successive cars, which is the area of the repeating parallelograms =)

Lance Kuanwu - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Agreed. I drew a v,t graph myself and from there it is simple multiplication and super-intuitive. This graph is too complicated for the task... If the problem would have stated that the second car started driving when the distance was a certain amount, then this x,t graph makes more sense.

Roland van Vliembergen - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Agree! Just evaluate 1.5*20=30 for the parallelogram area, +2 for the initial distance. Total distance 32m.

Simone Bertone - 3 years, 1 month ago

If the acceleration is 4m/sec^2, then the rate of acceleration is equal to 4t. the velocity at a time t would be 2t^2. The point where the first car reaches 6m/s would be where 6=2t^2, or 3^.5. this would give a distance at the terminal speed of 20m/s of approx 36.6 meters. the answer is not an integer, or 36 or 37 should be accepted. Or is acceleration really linear?

Trea Dmill - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Your formula for the velocity is incorrect. The velocity at time t t is v = a t = ( 4 m / s 2 ) t v=at=(4m/s^2)t , therefore t = v / a = 6 m / s 4 m / s 2 = 1.5 s t=v/a=\frac{6m/s}{4m/s^2}=1.5s .

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years, 1 month ago
Binky Mh
Apr 30, 2018

Each car starts moving 1.5 s 1.5\ \text{s} after the car in front. The distance travelled & time taken during acceleration is the same for every car, but the car in front will have travelled at 20 m/s 20\ \text{m/s} for 1.5 s 1.5\ \text{s} before the car behind reaches top speed. This means the car in front will have travelled 30 m 30\ \text{m} more than the car behind. adding this to the starting 2 m 2\ \text{m} gap gives us the total difference of 32 m \boxed{32\ \text{m}} .

There is a problem with the answer. The problem states that distance apart is when all car reach 20m/s. Therefore the first car stops accelerating once it reaches 20m/s yet the second car continues to accelerate until it reaches 2m/s. Therefore the two cars are accelerating for the same period at the same acceration covering the same distance. The answer is 2m

Nathan Sadownik - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

That would be the case if they started accelerating at the same time, but they didn't. The car behind is at 0m/s for 1.5 seconds longer than the car in front (before accelerating), and the car in front is at 20m/s for 1.5 seconds longer than the car behind (after accelerating).

Binky MH - 3 years, 1 month ago
Elizandro Max
May 1, 2018

Consider the graph of speed as a function of time. At this rate of acceleration, each car starts accelerating 1.5 s after the one before. The colors of the lines are the same as the cars in the problem. Therefore the blue area is the distance between the blue and the red car, if they had started together, so 30 m. As they started 2 m apart, they end up being 32 m apart.

And, essential to your solution: the blue area (the part between the blue and red graph) is equal to the difference in displacement of the two cars. It is a parallelogram with base 1.5 s \SI{1.5}{s} and height 20 m / s \SI{20}{m/s} .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 1 month ago
D B
May 1, 2018

Ignore the acceleration, the cars do the same thing just offset by 1.5 seconds. When travelling at 20 m/s, 1.5 seconds translates to a 30 meter difference. They were also 2 meter apart at the start giving 20 m / s × 1.5 s + 2 m = 32 m \SI{20}{m/s} \times \SI{1.5}{s} + \SI{2}{m} = \SI{32}{m}

How did you get 1.5 seconds?

Jellies Forever - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

They have reformulated the question since I answered it, but now you would get it from "car starts accelerating at 4 m/s^2. As soon as the first car reaches a speed of 6 m/s". That takes 1.5 seconds. It was more obvious before.

D B - 3 years ago
Conor McMenamin
May 2, 2018

In a velocity-time graph, distance covered equals area under the curve. The distance-time graph for two adjacent cars looks like this: The second car sets off at 1.5s (when the first car has reached 6m/s). The difference in distance travelled is the green area. This has a base of 1.5s and a height of 20m/s, so an area of 30m. Add on the initial separation of 2m to get 32m.

You can do it in your head: Taking the position of the first car as the origin, the first car will reach x x meters from the origin in t t seconds. The second car will reach x 2 x-2 meters from the origin in t + 1.5 t+1.5 seconds. So the distance between them will be 20 × 1.5 + 2 = 32 20\times 1.5+2=32 .

I forgot something. It works for t in which both cars are already at the constant velocity of 20 m/s.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 1 month ago

Evaluate [ Assuming [ t 0 t R , 0 t 0 t ( { 4 0 x < 5 ) d x d t ] ( Assuming [ t 0 t R , 0 t 0 t ( { 4 3 2 x < 5 + 3 2 ) d x d t ] 2 ) ] /. t 10 32 \text{Evaluate}\left[ \\ \ \ \text{Assuming}\left[t\geq 0\land t\in \mathbb{R},\int _0^t\int _0^t\left( \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 4 & 0\leq x<5 \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} \right)dxdt\right]- \\ \ \ \left(\text{Assuming}\left[t\geq 0\land t\in \mathbb{R},\int _0^t\int _0^t\left( \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 4 & \frac{3}{2}\leq x<5+\frac{3}{2} \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} \right)dxdt\right]-2\right)\right]\text{/.}\, t\to 10 \Rightarrow 32

The car separations:

Assuming [ t 0 t R , 0 t 0 t ( { 4 0 x < 5 ) d x d t ] { 2 t 2 0 < t 5 10 ( 2 t 5 ) t > 5 \text{Assuming}\left[t\geq 0\land t\in \mathbb{R},\int _0^t\int _0^t\left( \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 4 & 0\leq x<5 \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} \right)dxdt\right] \Rightarrow \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 2 t^2 & 0<t\leq 5 \\ 10 (2 t-5) & t>5 \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array}

Assuming [ t 0 t R , 0 t 0 t ( { 4 3 2 x < 5 + 3 2 ) d x d t ] 2 ( { 20 ( t 4 ) t > 13 2 1 2 ( 4 t 2 12 t + 9 ) 3 2 < t 13 2 ) 2 \text{Assuming}\left[t\geq 0\land t\in \mathbb{R},\int _0^t\int _0^t\left( \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 4 & \frac{3}{2}\leq x<5+\frac{3}{2} \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} \right)dxdt\right]-2 \Rightarrow \left( \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 20 (t-4) & t>\frac{13}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} \left(4 t^2-12 t+9\right) & \frac{3}{2}<t\leq \frac{13}{2} \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} \right)-2

FullSimplify [ 10 ( 2 t 5 ) ( 20 ( t 4 ) 2 ) ] 32 \text{FullSimplify}[10 (2 t-5)-(20 (t-4)-2)]\Rightarrow 32

Sajjad K
May 6, 2018

I just guessed 2^5 = 32 Not sure that can be put to practice.

Charles Ran
May 5, 2018

The first car accelerates to 6 m / s 2 6m/s^2 at 1.5 sec. Then the second car drives. So it takes 1.5 sec for the second car to get to 20 m / s 2 20m/s^2 after the first car gets there. That means the first car can drive another 1.5 seconds of 20 m / s 20m/s . Which is 30 meters, plus the initial 2 meters, is 32 meters.

If the acceleration is 4m/sec^2, then the rate of acceleration is equal to 4t. the velocity at a time t would be 2t^2. The point where the first car reaches 6m/s would be where 6=2t^2, or 3^.5. this would give a distance at the terminal speed of 20m/s of approx 36.6 meters. the answer is not an integer, or 36 or 37 should be accepted. Or is acceleration really linear?

Trea Dmill - 3 years, 1 month ago
Adir Krafman
May 5, 2018

At an acceleration of 4 m / s 2 4m/s^2 each car reaches a speed of 6 m / s 6m/s after 1.5 s 1.5s and a speed of 20 m / s 20m/s after 5 s 5s .

So we know the last car will drive for 5 s 5s , the middle car will drive for 5 + 1.5 = 6.5 s 5+1.5=6.5s , and the front car will drive 5 + 2 ( 1.5 ) = 8 s 5+2(1.5) = 8s

To calculate distance D ( t ) = { 0 t 4 t = 2 t 2 t 5 20 x t > x D(t) = \begin{cases} \int_{0}^{t} 4t = 2t^2 & t\leq 5 \\ 20x & t\gt x \end{cases}

First car traveled 110 + 4 = 114 m 110+4 = 114m ; second car traveled 80 + 2 = 82 m 80+2=82m ; last car traveled 50 m 50m

Δ \Delta between cars = 32 m = \boxed{32m}

If the acceleration is 4m/sec^2, then the rate of acceleration is equal to 4t. the velocity at a time t would be 2t^2. The point where the first car reaches 6m/s would be where 6=2t^2, or 3^.5. this would give a distance at the terminal speed of 20m/s of approx 36.6 meters. the answer is not an integer, or 36 or 37 should be accepted. Or is acceleration really linear?

Trea Dmill - 3 years, 1 month ago
Ximple Shum
May 2, 2018

The question is easier if we calculate it backwards, start considering the last car.

Buy the time the rear car accelerates to 20m/s, the front car already accelerates to 20m/s 1.5 seconds ago (6/4=1.5s), and keep constant speed at 20m/s for 1.5s.

We don't need to care the positive acceleration part, because both cars moves for same distance during their acceleration. It doesn't affect their separation.

So final distance between them is just 20*1.5+2 = 32m, where the 2m is their initial separation.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
# https://brilliant.org/weekly-problems/2018-04-30/intermediate/?problem=its-green
speed_i = 0  # m/s
speed_f = 20 # m/s
acc = 4 # m/s**2
speed_car_moves = 6 # m/s
init_dist_bet_cars = 2 # m

t_car2 = (speed_f-speed_i)/acc  # s
d_car2 = 0.5*acc*t_car2**2  # m

#Calculate distance car 1 has travelled while car2 moved d_car2
t_car1car2 = float(speed_car_moves)/acc  # time elapsed before car 2 begins to move
d_car1 = d_car2 + speed_f * t_car1car2  # m

print 'Cars are %dm apart ' % (d_car1 - d_car2 + init_dist_bet_cars)

1
Cars are 32m apart 

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...