It's Integral right triangle

Suppose p p is a prime such that p 3 ( m o d 4 ) p≡3(\mod 4) . Then how many non-congruent right angle triangle with integer sides exists such that one of it's side is p p ?

  • Enter 1 -1 if you think there are infinitely many such triangles


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Let the lengths of sides of the right triangle be p , x , y p, x, y with x > y x>y . We have to consider two cases :

(i) p p is the hypotenuse.

In this case, p p can be expressed as a 2 + b 2 a^2+b^2 where a a and b b are coprime integers. For both a a and b b odd, p 2 ( m o d 4 ) p\equiv 2 (\mod 4) . For one of them even and the other odd, p 1 ( m o d 4 ) p\equiv 1 (\mod 4) . For both of them even, p 0 ( m o d 4 ) p\equiv 0 (\mod 4) .

Hence there is no solution in this case.

(ii) p p is one of the legs :

In this case x 2 y 2 = p 2 ( x + y ) ( x y ) = p 2 x^2-y^2=p^2\implies (x+y)(x-y) =p^2 . Since p p is prime, p 2 p^2 has three factors , viz. 1 , p , p 2 1,p,p^2 .

So the only possibility is x + y = p 2 , x y = 1 x = p 2 + 1 2 , y = p 2 1 2 x+y=p^2, x-y=1\implies x=\dfrac{p^2+1}{2},y=\dfrac{p^2-1}{2} .

Thus, in all there is only one such integer sided right triangle

Case (i) is more complex than this. We must have p 2 = a 2 + b 2 p^2 = a^2 + b^2 (not just p p ), and p 2 p^2 is congruent to 1 1 modulo 4 4 . However, since p 3 ( m o d 4 ) p \equiv 3 \pmod{4} , p p is an irreducible element of the Euclidean domain Z [ i ] \mathbb{Z}[i] of Gaussian integers, and since p 2 = ( a + i b ) ( a i b ) p^2 = (a + ib)(a - ib) , we deduce that p p must divide either a + i b a + ib or a i b a - ib , which means that a = p A a = pA and b = p B b = pB where A 2 + B 2 = 1 A^2 + B^2 = 1 , and hence one of a , b a,b must be 0 0 . Thus no triangle is possible in this case.

Mark Hennings - 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Any pythagorean triples is of the form ( m 2 + n 2 , 2 m n , m 2 n 2 ) ; m Z , n Z (m^2+n^2,2mn,m^2-n^2); m \in Z , n \in Z here m 2 + n 2 m^2+n^2 is the hypotenuse, \therefore hypotenuse of any integral right angle triangle must be able to be represented as the sum of squares of 2 2 integers which is not in the case p 3 ( m o d 4 ) \because p≡3 (\mod 4) and it is a prime see Fermat's theorem on sum of two squares. . No need to include complex solution.

Zakir Husain - 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, that all depends on what was meant by a a and b b in the first proof... At the least, it needs to be more clearly expressed.

Mark Hennings - 12 months ago

Nope. According to my choice (I have mentioned that the sides of the triangle are of lengths p , x , y p, x, y ), p 2 = x 2 + y 2 p^2=x^2+y^2 , and not a 2 + b 2 a^2+b^2 .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...