Find the sum of all negative integer x that satisfies the inequality below:
∣ x − 3 ∣ × ∣ x + 7 ∣ − ∣ x + 3 ∣ × ∣ x − 7 ∣ > 0
Notation: ∣ ⋅ ∣ denotes the absolute value function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For − 3 ≤ x < 0 , the inequality becomes:
( − x + 3 ) ( x + 7 ) − ( x + 3 ) ( − x + 7 ) − x 2 − 4 x + 2 1 + x 2 − 4 x − 2 1 − 8 x ⟹ − 3 ≤ x > 0 > 0 > 0 < 0
For − 7 ≤ x < − 3 , the inequality becomes:
( − x + 3 ) ( x + 7 ) − ( − x − 3 ) ( − x + 7 ) − x 2 − 4 x + 2 1 − x 2 + 4 x + 2 1 x 2 ⟹ − 2 1 ≤ x > 0 > 0 < 2 1 < − 3
For x < − 7 , the inequality becomes:
( − x + 3 ) ( − x − 7 ) − ( − x − 3 ) ( − x + 7 ) x 2 + 4 x − 2 1 − x 2 + 4 x + 2 1 8 x > 0 > 0 > 0 There is no solution.
Therefore the range of negative x satisfying the inequality is − 2 1 ≤ x < 0 and the sum of negative integer x satisfying the inequality is − 4 − 3 − 2 − 1 = − 1 0 .
@Zakir Husain , use references from Brilliant.org if they are available. I have changed that for absolute value function for you.
How I did it was:
( x + 7 ) = − 7
( x + 3 ) = − 3
− 7 + − 3 = − 7 − 3 = - 1 0
This is wrong. You did not demonstrate that no other solutions exist.
Hahaha that is funny
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can perform the multiplications in the expression to get ∣ x 2 + 4 x − 2 1 ∣ > ∣ x 2 − 4 x − 2 1 ∣
A trick we can use here is just squaring both sides; we get ( x 2 + 4 x − 2 1 ) 2 > ( x 2 − 4 x − 2 1 ) 2 x 4 + 8 x 3 − 2 6 x 2 − 1 6 8 x + 4 4 1 > x 4 − 8 x 3 − 2 6 x 2 + 1 6 8 x + 4 4 1 1 6 x 3 − 3 3 6 x > 0 x ( x 2 − 2 1 ) > 0
Since we're looking for negative integer x , we need to find negative integer solutions to x 2 − 2 1 < 0 (note the change in direction of the inequality, as we've divided by x , which is negative). These are clearly just the integers − 4 , − 3 , − 2 , − 1 with sum − 1 0 .
A couple of notes on this approach. It might seem like a crazy idea to choose to go from simple quadratics up to a quartic by squaring. First, the similarity in the two terms suggests there will be a lot of cancellation. Second, the usual method (which works fine) is to deal with the absolute value functions by considering different intervals; we can see the answer should be fairly simple; this again suggests that things should simplify fairly neatly, and we see that they do.