+ + S = K A A K O S R I S H A M A I O O K M K N A I E O
Find O S A K A
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
In the first paragraph, why can we "deduce that there must be a carry over of 1 from the third column"? Why can't the carry over be 2? After all, we are summing 3 terms.
In the first paragraph, why can we "deduce that there must be a carry over of 1 from the third column"? Why can't the carry over be 2? After all, we are summing 3 terms.
Log in to reply
Good point. Totally forgot about the possibility. Guess I will have to rethink about it.
Log in to reply
I think we will have to consider the case of K = 8 , and then look at how we can obtain a carry over of 2. For example, in the first column we have S = 7 and from the carry over of 2 we must have { I , O } = { 9 , 6 } , { 9 , 5 } .
KIMONO + OSAKA + SASHIMI = KARAOKE
Obviously from kimono's K + sashimi's A = karaoke's A, K has to be either 9 or 8, depending on the carryover from ten thousands' I + O + S + p, whether this would be 10+ or 20+. Anyway, S = K - 1 so S = { 8, 7 } as K = { 9, 8 } and therefore 8 is already taken in either way.
Ones : O + A + I = E + 10t
Tens : N + K + M + t = K + 10r
Hundreds : O + A + I + r = O + 10q
Thousands : M + S + H + q = A + 10p
Ten Thousands : I + O + S + p = R + 10j
Hundred Thousands : K + A + j = A + 10
Millions : S + 1 = K
Observing the hundreds place, A + I + r = 10q, but we know r ≤ 2 because we are summing 3 numbers while A and I are two distinct digits, therefore A + I = { 8, 9, 10 } and q = 1.
Furthermore, by the same argument of summing 3 numbers while N and M are two distinct digits, we have N + M = { 8, 9, 10 } and r = 1. However, the ones place is a repeat of A + I, and we already know that this time t = q = 1 (because we rejected the possibility of O = 0 by the convention of no zero leading digits in OSAKA) . In conclusion, q = r = t = 1 and by that, A + I = M + N = 9 with E = O - 1.
And since we already got equations involving more than half of the digits, pairs of oppositional parity is observed in the 9 summations for A, I, M & N and differences of 1 for S, K, E & O. Surely, H and R must have an opposite parity, too.
Thousands : M + S + H + 1 = A + 10p
Ten Thousands : I + O + S + p = R + 10j
Hundred Thousands : K + A + j = A + 10
I'll have to come again & edit this further, no preview for comments somehow.
Sorry this is so awkward in the future but this is how I found it:
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
+ + S = K A A K O S R I S H A M A I O O K M K N A I E O
Terminology : I read the cryptogram from left to right. So the first column refers to the leftmost column.
From the second column, seeing that K + A gives A , an impossibility with no carry over, we can deduce that there must be a carry over of 1 from the third column. Therefore, K = 9 . The carry over of 1 from the second column to the first column implies that S = 8 .
Now, take a look at the fifth and seventh column. Both column features O + A + I . We deduce that O + A + I ≥ 1 0 . With O + A + I < 1 0 , O + A + I cannot gives O . Even if we consider a carry over of 1 from the sixth column causing a carry over from fifth column to fourth column, only possible if E = 9 and O = 0 , this creates contradictions since 9 is already represented by K while O cannot be 0 since O S A K A starts with O . We then observe that E + 1 = O due to the carry over from the sixth column. There must be a carry over. Or else, O + A + I will just give E , as expected from first column. Possible candidates for E , O (in ordered pairs) are ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 3 ) , ( 3 , 4 ) , ( 4 , 5 ) , ( 5 , 6 ) , ( 6 , 7 ) .
A consequence of E + 1 = O is that A + I = 9 . This is apparent if we look at the final column.
We now take a look at the fifth column, where N + 9 + M gives 9 . Knowing that there is a carry over from the first column, we deduce that N + M = 9 . Possible candidates for N , M and A , I (in unordered pairs) are ( 2 , 7 ) , ( 3 , 6 ) , ( 4 , 5 ) .
Observe that it is only possible to choose ( 2 , 7 ) , ( 3 , 6 ) or ( 3 , 6 ) , ( 4 , 5 ) to represent ( N , M ) and ( A , I ) , with the two options giving ( 4 , 5 ) and ( 1 , 2 ) for ( E , O ) respectively. We cannot choose ( 2 , 7 ) , ( 4 , 5 ) since no options will be left for ( E , O ) .
We now prove that ( 3 , 6 ) , ( 4 , 5 ) is tbe correct choice for ( N , M ) and ( A , I ) . Suppose that we choose ( 2 , 7 ) , ( 3 , 6 ) instead. Note that all numbers are exhausted except 0 and 1 . Now, take a look at the third column where I + O + S gives R . Note that the choice of ( 0 , 1 ) for ( I , R ) (unordered) won't fit (with carry over or not), bearing in mind that O = 5 and S = 8 .
After all this hard work, it is pretty easy to deduce that N , M , A . I represents 5 , 4 , 3 , 6 respectively just by some trial and error (plugging in numbers to see if they fit). After all the hard work we did, this small bit of trivial checking cannot be perceived as hand-wavy. Subsequent work also reveals that R = 7 and H = 0 .