JEE Advanced: Quadratic equations & inequations

Algebra Level 4

If set of all possible values of k k for which every solution of the inequality x 2 ( 3 k 1 ) x + 2 k 2 3 k 2 0 { x }^{ 2 }-(3k-1)x+2k^{ 2 }-3k-2\ge 0 is also a solution of the inequality x 2 1 0 { x }^{ 2 }-1\ge 0 are [ l , m ] [l,m] , then find the value of l + m l+m .


The answer is 1.0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Hrithik Thakur
Nov 1, 2019

Suppose
f ( x ) = x 2 ( 3 k 1 ) x + 2 k 2 3 k 2 f(x)=x^{2}-(3k-1)x+2k^{2}-3k-2

= x 2 [ ( 2 k + 1 ) + ( k 2 ) ] x + ( 2 k 1 ) ( k 2 ) = x^{2}-[(2k+1)+(k-2)]x+(2k-1)(k-2)

= [ x ( 2 k + 1 ) ] [ x ( k 2 ) ] =[x-(2k+1)][x-(k-2)]

So, the inequality simplifies to, [ x ( 2 k + 1 ) ] [ x ( k 2 ) ] 0 [x-(2k+1)][x-(k-2)] \geq 0

Also, x 2 1 0 x^{2}-1\geq 0 is true for all x lying in ( , 1 ) ( 1 , ) (\infty,-1)\cup(1,\infty) .

We are being asked to find the interval for k such that all values of x which satisfy f ( x ) 0 f(x)\geq 0 are a subset of ( , 1 ) ( 1 , ) (\infty,-1)\cup(1,\infty)

\Rightarrow Both 1 and -1 must lie in between the two distinct roots f(x)=0, which is a quadratic equation 'opening upwards'.

The required necessary and sufficient conditions are:

1. f ( 1 ) 0 1.f(1) \leq 0

1 2 ( 3 k 1 ) ( 1 ) + 2 k 2 3 k 2 0 \Rightarrow 1^{2}-(3k-1)(1)+2k^{2}-3k-2\leq0

2 k 2 6 k 0 \Rightarrow 2k^{2}-6k\leq0

k ( k 3 ) 0 \Rightarrow k(k-3)\leq 0

k \Rightarrow k lies in [0,3] .

2. f ( 1 ) 0 ( 1 ) 2 ( 3 k 1 ) ( 1 ) + 2 k 2 3 k 2 0 2.f(-1)\leq0 \Rightarrow (-1)^{2}-(3k-1)(-1)+2k^{2}-3k-2\leq0

2 k 2 2 0 \Rightarrow 2k^{2}-2\leq0

( k 1 ) ( k + 1 ) 0 \Rightarrow (k-1)(k+1)\leq 0

k \Rightarrow k lies in [-1,1].

Lastly, for two distinct roots of f(x)=0, we need,

3. D > 0 3.D > 0 , where D D is the discriminant of f(x)=0.

( 3 k 1 ) 2 4 ( 1 ) ( 2 k 2 3 k 2 ) > 0 \Rightarrow (3k-1)^{2}-4(1)(2k^{2}-3k-2)>0

9 k 2 6 k + 1 8 k 2 + 12 k + 8 > 0 \Rightarrow 9k^{2}-6k+1-8k^{2}+12k+8>0

k 2 + 6 k + 9 > 0 \Rightarrow k^{2}+6k+9>0

( k + 3 ) 2 > 0 \Rightarrow (k+3)^{2}>0 , which is true for any real k k .

k \Rightarrow k lies in ( , ) (-\infty,\infty)

The intersection of the above three intervals of k gives us the required set, which is [0,1].

Hence, l = 0 , m = 1 l=0, m=1

l + m = 1 \therefore l+m = \boxed1

Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't the first inequality says that Discriminant should be smaller than or equal to 0. Also if I put k=1 in the first inequality I don't get a number greater than 0 for every x. As I've equated D to being smaller than 0 I get only one possible value of k which is-3

Hitesh Yadav - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

Hello! Sorry for responding late. I am unable to understand you. Can you please explain yourself more clearly?

Hrithik Thakur - 9 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Sorry, I also forgot to tell that I misunderstood the problem. Without considering the second statement I decided to put Discriminant smaller than zero for the first quadratic which landed me on the result that k can only have value equal to -3.

Hitesh Yadav - 9 months, 2 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...