Let tangents be drawn to the curve y = sin x from the origin.
Let the points of contact of these tangents with the curve be ( x k , y k ) , where x k > 0 ; k ≥ 1 such that x k ∈ ( π k , ( k + 1 ) π ) and a k = x k 2 + y k 2 , which is the distance between the corresponding point of contact and the origin or the length of tangent from the origin,
If K = k = 1 ∑ ∞ a k 2 1 , find ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 0 K ⌋ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This is really neat - I tried something similar but didn't spot the partial fraction decomposition. I also wasn't sure about using Vieta here - it doesn't always work to assume that power series behave like infinite polynomials, and it can be quite hard to justify (I think the most famous example of this is in Euler's original solution of the Basel problem - the use of this type of approach in that case was only rigorously justified 100 years later by Weierstrass)
One question, though, what happens to the contribution of the negative roots in the Vieta sums?
(by the way - I think you mean "Coefficient of x^2" in your last equation)
Log in to reply
Nope I mean coefficient of x Only because I changed x → x − 2 so it would not be the coefficient of x²
For the tangent to the curve y = f ( x ) at ( t , f ( t ) ) to pass through O , we need
f ′ ( t ) = t f ( t )
In this case, this becomes t = tan t . The x k are the positive roots of this equation. It didn't seem likely that I would get anywhere with this analytically, so I proceeded numerically from here.
My idea was to use Newton's method to solve t − tan t = 0 in the intervals ( k π , ( k + 1 ) π ) to work out the x k , which would then give a k . However, the gradients involved in the tan formulation are very large near the roots, so this iteration scheme is not numerically stable.
I therefore set up Newton's method for the (equivalent) equation t cos t − sin t = 0 .
This gives as a scheme for iteration
t 0 t n + 1 = k π + 2 π = t n + t n sin t n t n cos t n − sin t n = t n − t n 1 + cot t n
which converges rapidly to x k .
The first few roots are below:
k | x k |
1 | 4 . 4 9 3 4 … |
2 | 7 . 7 2 5 3 … |
3 | 1 0 . 9 0 4 1 … |
4 | 1 4 . 0 6 6 2 … |
5 | 1 7 . 2 2 0 8 … |
We can then calculate the corresponding values of a k . If we let S N = ∑ k = 1 N a k 2 1 (so the answer we want is S ∞ ), we have the following partial sums:
N | S N |
1 0 | 0 . 0 8 8 1 6 7 3 … |
1 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 6 3 7 1 4 … |
1 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 2 7 3 4 … |
1 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 6 4 5 … |
1 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 3 6 … |
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 5 … |
We could stop here, but the partial sums converge quite slowly in this case. It's worth noting that we can approximate the error term S ∞ − S N as well: note that for large k , the tangents occur nearer and nearer to the peaks and troughs of the sine curve, so that x k ≈ k π + 2 π and y k ≈ ± 1 and a k 2 ≈ 1 + ( k π + 2 π ) 2
If we define
T N = k = 0 ∑ N 1 + ( k π + 2 π ) 2 1
(note the changed lower limit of the sum - to be explained in a moment) then S ∞ − S N ≈ T ∞ − T N
The reason for the change of lower limit is that with this definition, we can use the (remarkable) identity T ∞ = 2 tanh 1 (I can't claim credit for this - thank you, Wolfram|Alpha!)
So S N ∗ = S N + 2 tanh 1 − T N should be an even better approximation to S ∞ . Indeed, we get
N | S N ∗ |
1 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 6 9 5 … |
1 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 6 … |
1 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 6 … |
1 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 6 … |
1 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 6 … |
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 . 0 9 7 3 7 4 6 … |
which clearly converges rapidly, giving the answer 9 7 3 7 .
I'd be really interested (1) if someone has a non-numerical (or better numerical) way of doing this and (2) what the inspiration for this problem was!
Log in to reply
@Chris Lewis You can check out my answer I have posted it now.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Hints:
It is quite obvious that x k are the positive roots of the equation tan x = x
Using some coordinate geometry we can find that the locus of points of contact is x 2 − y 2 = x 2 y 2
Using this information we see that we need to find k = 1 ∑ ∞ x k 2 ( x k 2 + 2 ) x k 2 + 1 = 2 1 ( k = 1 ∑ ∞ x k 2 1 + k = 1 ∑ ∞ x k 2 + 2 1 )
Now writing power series of x 3 sin x − x cos x about 0 will give a polynomial with positive roots of tan x = x . Using Vieta's formula we see that k = 1 ∑ ∞ x k 2 1 = Constant term -Coefficient of x² = 1 0 1
Also changing x → x − 2 in the power series and using the same method above gives k = 1 ∑ ∞ x k 2 + 2 1 = Constant term -Coefficient of x = 4 ( 2 cosh ( 2 ) − 2 sinh ( 2 ) ) 5 2 sinh ( 2 ) − 6 cosh ( 2 )
You could also also check out another method used by robjohn on My question here