Kitty litter box

Algebra Level 2

I want to make a litter box for my newly adopted pet kitten Admiral. The box is a cuboid with the top removed. I want the volume of the box to be 32 but the surface area to be minimized.

What is the minimum internal surface area I can achieve?


The answer is 48.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Pi Han Goh
May 3, 2015

Let the dimensions be a , b , c a,b,c , then the volume is a b c = 32 abc = 32 and surface area b c + 2 a c + 2 a b bc + 2ac +2ab . (note the top is removed)

Let a = A , b = 2 B , c = 2 C a = A', b = 2B', c = 2C' . then A B C = 8 A' B' C' = 8

And we want to minimize 4 ( B C + A C + A B ) 4(B' C' + A'C' + A'B') .

Apply AM-GM: 4 ( B C + A C + A B ) 4 3 ( A B C ) 2 3 = 4 3 8 2 / 3 = 48 4(B' C' + A'C' + A'B') \geq 4\cdot 3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{(A'B'C')^2} = 4\cdot 3 \cdot 8^{2/3} =\boxed {48} .

Nice smile.

Jake Lai - 6 years, 1 month ago
Tasneem Waly
May 8, 2015

I Just assumed that when abc = 32 , so a=4 , b=4 ,and c=2 .Then I get the minimum internal surface area . I feel stupid after seeing your complicated answers.

Moderator note:

Like Jake Lai has mentioned, how do you know it must have a minimum value in the first place? And how would you know that it must occur at a = 4 , b = 4 , c = 2 a=4,b=4,c=2 ?

How do you prove that of all the positive real numbers a , b , c a, b, c that that gives the minimum surface area?

Jake Lai - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

when I see a Puzzle like this I used to solve it the same way , whether he asked for minimum or maximum surface area , and it always be right. With little numbers like 32 it's easy to think what are the three numbers that if we multiply them get 32 ? So I just say they would be 4 , 4, 2 for sure. I'm really sorry if I can't explain well , I don't know mathematical terms so I couldn't understand your answer. I Just play this App from time to time , I don't follow certain way.

Tasneem Waly - 6 years, 1 month ago
Jake Lai
May 3, 2015

You can solve this by some inequality or other but I bashed my way through with my newfound powers of Langrange multipliers!!!11!1 Yeah, that wasn't as exciting as we might have expected.

Let the box have dimensions x × y × z x \times y \times z . Our constraint here is that g = x y z 32 = 0 g = xyz-32 = 0 and the function to be minimised is f = 2 x y + 2 y z + x z f = 2xy+2yz+xz . Now, to minimise, we just set

f = λ g \nabla f = \lambda \nabla g

for λ \lambda some constant. Taking the partial derivatives of f f and g g , we obtain the three equations

2 y + z = λ y z ; 2 x + 2 z = λ x z ; 2 y + x = λ x y 2y+z = \lambda yz; \quad 2x+2z = \lambda xz; \quad 2y+x = \lambda xy

Combining those with our constraint g g we get a system of simultaneous equations. Solving it yields 2 y = x = z = 4 2y = x = z = 4 ; hence,

min f = 48 \min f = \boxed{48}

You should post another cat picture to be consistent.

Pi Han Goh - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I'll do you two better. Just don't let Godel catch us.

Jake Lai - 6 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...