A massive scalar field ϕ ( x , t ) of mass m in quantum field theory satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation
( □ + m 2 ) ϕ ( x , t ) = 0 ,
where □ indicates the d'Alembert wave operator:
□ = − ∂ t 2 ∂ 2 + ∂ x 2 ∂ 2 + ∂ y 2 ∂ 2 + ∂ z 2 ∂ 2 .
Find the Green's function of the Klein-Gordon operator in momentum space by Fourier transform. Note that k = ( E , k ) is a vector with four components: the energy of a particle, and its three components of spatial momentum.
Notation : abs ( ⋅ ) denotes the absolute value function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Might be a tad tricky for those who aren't acquainted with the basics of QFT...
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Fourier transforming converts the wave operator □ into k 2 . This is motivated by the action of □ on the plane wave giving the momentum dependence in the Fourier transform:
□ e i k ⋅ x = ∂ 2 e i k ⋅ x ∼ k 2 e i k ⋅ x ,
which implies the conversion □ ∼ k 2 .
In the convention given, k 2 = − m 2 for a particle that is on-shell. Particles in QFT correspond to the poles of the Green's function, so the denominator should take the form k 2 + m 2 .
Getting the signs right in Fourier transforming the derivative in QFT can be tricky, especially because the metric convention depends on the author. This problem uses a somewhat atypical convention for the metric than is usually taught in introductory QFT, in which k 2 = − m 2 instead of k 2 = m 2 . Note also that in field theory textbooks there is also often a factor of i in the definition of the Green's function which has been omitted from this article for consistency.
In any case, the conversion □ ∼ k 2 , even up to sign and numerical factors, implies the inversion of the operator:
( □ + m 2 ) − 1 → k 2 + m 2 1
which is the desired Green's function. Whether it is the Feynman or retarded propagator is not particularly important for this question, since this only specifies a pole convention for integration to position space.