previous question . Furthermore, in the above gif, we see that the Koch snowflake is self-similar, as zooming in on the perimeter reveals the exact same shape.
The Koch snowflake has several surprising properties, as illustrated in theWhich of the following statements is false of the Koch Snowflake, with initial side length ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This question is hard if you do not know where to start.
The statement about subdivision into 7 smaller snowflakes of the same size is wrong.
Proof by contradiction, assume it is correct. By considering the areas, the smaller snowflakes must each have side length 7 1 s . This clearly cannot fit into the snowflake.
What is true though, is that it can be subdivided into 7 smaller snowflakes. 6 of size 3 1 in each of the 'corners' and 1 of size 3 1 in the center.
Here is a tessellation of the snowflake in the plane. It surprised me when I first saw it.
image
Let's tackle an easy one, namely the area. Starting with an equilateral triangle of side length s , it has area X = 4 3 s 2 .
In the first step, there are 3 line segments.
In the second step, there are 12 line segments.
At the nth step, there are 3 × 4 n − 1 line segments.
In the first step, the area of the small triangles added is 9 X .
In the second step, the area of the small triangles added is 9 2 X .
In the nth step, the area of the small triangles added is 9 n X .
Hence, the total area is X + 9 3 X + 9 2 3 × 4 X + … + 9 n 3 × 4 n − 1 X .
Ignoring the first two terms, we get a geometric progression with common ratio 9 4 , and hence the sum is 9 2 3 × 4 X × 1 − 9 4 1 = 1 5 4 X . Hence, the total area is 5 8 X = 5 2 3 s 2 .
Thus, the statement on area is correct!
I leave the fact about a non-differentiable perimeter to you. It will require some work.