If x → a lim ( f ( x ) ⋅ g ( x ) ) exists, then both x → a lim f ( x ) and x → a lim g ( x ) always exist.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
False.
Consider f ( x ) = x − a ∣ x − a ∣ and g ( x ) = ∣ x − a ∣ x − a .
Then x → a lim ( f ( x ) ⋅ g ( x ) ) exists, but both x → a lim f ( x ) and x → a lim g ( x ) do not exist.
Just change to normal curve brackets and you don't need to clarify. I changed it to a bigger pair using \ big( and \ big). Actually when you are using floor function then you clarify and ordinary brackets no need to clarify. Also floor function is ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ not brackets.
Log in to reply
I know, but in our country the convention is square brackets and it is stated that it represents G.I.F. So, I thought many may get confused whether to treat it as G.I.F. or simple square brackets. The big parentheses are good. Thanks for the tip.
Log in to reply
They are used for convenience only. Not the official one.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Take f(x) = x and g(x) = 1/x.