This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I got to your line with r * cos(theta) * sin(theta). Then I thought to myself, for any infinitesimal radius epsilon, there is profound variation along theta. So the only way in which there is an unambiguous single answer is if we are actually at (0,0). But this seems to defy the concept of a limit, since a limit deals with what happens in proximity to a point, rather than what happens at the point. @Calvin Lin , am I totally wrong with this?
Log in to reply
This solution starts off "correct-ish", but just not written with the explanation of what is happening. He is parametrizing a path in the x-y plane with an endpoint at ( 0 , 0 ) , by using polar coordinates.
Also, at the end, replacing x and y with 0 isn't kosher.
What he should have written is lim ( x , y ) → 0 = lim r → 0 . Then, it is clear that lim r → 0 r cos θ sin θ = 0 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x = r c o s θ y = r s i n θ r = x 2 + y 2 = x , y → 0 , 0 lim r r c o s θ ∗ r s i n θ = x , y → 0 , 0 lim r r 2 ( c o s θ ∗ s i n θ ) = x , y → 0 , 0 lim 1 r c o s θ ∗ s i n θ = x , y → 0 , 0 lim 1 x 2 + y 2 ∗ c o s θ ∗ s i n θ = x , y → 0 , 0 lim 0 + 0 c o s θ ∗ s i n θ x , y → 0 , 0 lim = 0