This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Done the same way
@Ronak Agarwal what was the logic in assuming ksub0 as cot theta can u explain
Log in to reply
The hint lies in that 1 + k n 2 .
Just see the form of the recurrence putting k 0 = c o t ( θ ) helps a lot as you can see in the question.
Log in to reply
We can also substitute k1 as tanα to get the same answer 2/π.
Great proof, yet I'm still a bit confused on that last limit evaluated to 1/theta. Can you please tell me how?
Log in to reply
He calculated θ 1 0 using "l'Hôpital's rule": n → ∞ lim tan ( 2 − n θ 0 ) 2 − n = = n → ∞ lim d n d tan ( 2 − n θ 0 ) d n d 2 − n = = n → ∞ lim c o s 2 ( 2 − n θ 0 ) − n 2 − n − 1 θ 0 ln 2 − n 2 − n − 1 ln 2 = = θ 0 c o s 2 ( 0 ) = θ 1 0
Ah! I put thera(0) as pi .
Very Good Sum and Solution!!!!Did the same way :)(+1) obv...!!!!
but then there are infinite no of solutions as 3pi/2 is also a valid solution thus shouldn't the limit be non existant????
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Assume k 0 = c o t ( θ 0 ) . So we have
k 1 = c o s e c ( θ 0 ) + c o t ( θ 0 ) = s i n ( θ 0 ) 1 + c o s ( θ 0 ) = 2 s i n ( 2 θ 0 ) c o s ( 2 θ 0 ) 2 c o s 2 ( 2 θ 0 ) = c o t ( 2 θ 0 )
Similarly we have :
k 2 = c o t 2 2 θ 0
Continuing like this we have :
k n = c o t ( 2 n θ 0 )
Now back to the limits we have :
lim n → ∞ 2 n k n = lim n → ∞ 2 n c o t ( 2 n θ 0 ) = lim n → ∞ 2 n t a n ( 2 n θ 0 ) 1 = θ 0 1
In our given question c o t ( θ 0 ) = 0
⇒ θ 0 = 2 π
Our limit becomes L = π 2