n → ∞ lim n ∫ 1 e x 2 ( ln ( x ) ) n d x
For integer n , let L denote the value of the limit above. Find the value of ln ( L ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Excellent solution. I hadn't thought to bound it. I used the same substitution, but made e 3 z a Taylor series. I then distributed the limit and integral across the series since it converges uniformly, leaving me with the series representation for e 3 .
MIND BLOWING MAN....Take a bow wanna give u 5 upvotes sorry I can upvote only once :(!!!!
The top half is correct, but the latter half shows a very common misconception held by students.
The top half is correct, but the latter half shows a very common misconception held by students.
In particular, the claim of " n → ∞ , I n − 1 → I n is wrong. When we cannot say that
n → ∞ lim I n − 1 = I n
because the RHS is meaningless. What is the actual mathematically correct statement that you want to say?
Note: It need not be true that lim n → ∞ I n − 1 = lim n → ∞ I n . It is only true if the limit exists, which has yet to be shown.
Furthermore, there are many sequences that satisfy I n = 3 e 3 − 3 n I n − 1 . However, I_n = e^3 \frac{n+3} is not one of them.
I took ln(x)=t then I used reduction formula generated a pattern and took out e^(3x) common ,rest came out one...so on taking log answer came 3
Let the integral for a particular value of n be f (n). So solve f (n+1) by integration by parts. So we get a relation in terms of in the terms of f (n)and f (n+1). Now let f (n)=n×g (n) and since n tends to infinty Take g (n) and g (n+1) equal and find its value. It e^3. So the answer follows
Hey can you post your solution involving reduction formula. I tried doing doing that way but didn't succeed.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By change of variables x → exp ( z ) , the integral becomes I n = n ∫ 0 1 z n e 3 z d z Now, we will upper-bound and lower-bound the integral. Since z ≤ 1 throughout the range of the integral, we have, I n ≤ n ∫ 0 1 z n e 3 d z ≤ e 3 ( ∗ ) Similarly, from integration by-parts we obtain I n = n + 1 n e 3 − n + 1 3 n ∫ 0 1 e 3 z z n + 1 d z ≥ n + 1 n e 3 − ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) 3 n e 3 Taking limit as n → ∞ , we have n → ∞ lim I n ≥ e 3 ( ∗ ∗ ) The result now follows from ( ∗ ) and ( ∗ ∗ ) .