n → ∞ lim n 2 ( n a − n + 1 a )
Find the limit above for a > 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let f ( x ) = − a 1 / x . We are considering the behavior of the product n 2 ( f ( n + 1 ) − f ( n ) ) as n → ∞ .
Apply the mean value theorem to ( f ( n + 1 ) − f ( n ) ) : for every value of n , there exists a value x n ∈ ( n , n + 1 ) such that f ′ ( x n ) = ( f ( n + 1 ) − f ( n ) ) . (I'm implicitly using the fact that the length of the interval is 1 to ignore the denominator of the MVT.)
Note that since f ( x ) = − exp ( x ln a ) , f ′ ( x ) = − exp ( x ln a ) ( − x 2 ln a ) = − f ( x ) x 2 ln a .
Thus we are interested in the limit lim n → ∞ n 2 f ′ ( x n ) = lim n → ∞ n 2 ( − f ( x n ) ) x n 2 ln a .
Now it should be clear that lim n → ∞ f ( x n ) = − 1 , since lim x → ∞ ( 1 / x ) = 0 . Thus lim n → ∞ − f ( x n ) = 1 .
Also, note that, since n < x n < n + 1 for all n , then lim n → ∞ x n n = 1 .
Thus lim n → ∞ n 2 ( − f ( x n ) ) x n 2 ln a = lim n → ∞ x n 2 n 2 ln a = ln a .
make a change of variable n → n 1 , to have n → 0 lim n 2 1 ( a n − a n + 1 n ) = n → 0 lim n 2 1 [ exp ( n ln ( a ) ) − exp ( n + 1 n ln ( a ) ) ] = n → 0 lim n 2 1 [ exp ( n ln ( a ) ) − exp ( n ln ( a ) − n 2 ln ( a ) + O ( n 3 ) ) ] = n → 0 lim n 2 1 [ 1 + n ln ( a ) + 2 n 2 ln 2 ( a ) + O ( n 3 ) − ( 1 + ( n ln ( a ) − n 2 ln ( a ) ) + 2 ( n ln ( a ) − n 2 ln ( a ) ) 2 + O ( n 3 ) ) ] = n → 0 lim n 2 1 [ n 2 ln ( a ) + O ( n 3 ) ] = ln ( a )
Your limit is now n tends to 0, not infinity. Otherwise the last expression would mean another thing.
Log in to reply
oh yeah sorry typoed. thanks for pointing it out!
We just have to suppose a = 1 , then The Equation = 0 , ln a = 0 . So the answer is ln a .
L = n → ∞ lim n 2 ( n a − n + 1 a ) = n → ∞ lim n 2 1 a n 1 − a n + 1 1 = x → 0 lim x 2 a x − a 1 + x x = x → 0 lim 2 x a x ln a − ( 1 + x ) 2 a 1 + x x ln a = x → 0 lim 2 a x ln 2 a − ( 1 + x ) 4 a 1 + x x ln 2 a + ( 1 + x ) 3 2 a 1 + x x ln a = ln a Let x = n 1 A 0/0 case, L’H o ˆ pital’s rule applies After d x d up and down, a 0/0 case again d x d up and down again
Reference: L'Hôpital's rule
Since n 1 − n + 1 1 = n ( n + 1 ) 1 , we have: n 2 ( a n 1 − a n + 1 1 ) = n ( n + 1 ) 1 a n + 1 1 + n ( n + 1 ) 1 − a n + 1 1 ⋅ n ( n + 1 ) n 2 Taking the limit as n → ∞ , we get that the desired limit is equal to: d x d ( a x ) ∣ ∣ ∣ x = 0 = ln ( a ) ⋅ a x ∣ ∣ ∣ x = 0 = ln a
n 2 ( a 1 / n − a 1 / ( n + 1 ) ) = n 2 a 1 / ( n + 1 ) ( a 1 / n ( n + 1 ) − 1 ) = n 2 a 1 / ( n + 1 ) ( e ln ( a ) / n ( n + 1 ) − 1 ) n → + ∞ = n 2 [ n ( n + 1 ) ln ( a ) + o ( n ( n + 1 ) 1 ) ] = ln ( a ) + o ( 1 )
Note:
e u u → 0 = 1 + u + o ( u )
o ( n ( n + 1 ) 1 ) = o ( n 2 1 )
a 1 / ( n + 1 ) → 1
n ( n + 1 ) n 2 → 1
use Taylor's formula n a = e n ln a = 1 + n ln a + 2 n 2 ln 2 a + o ( n 3 1 )
so n a − n + 1 a = n ( n + 1 ) ln a + o ( n 3 1 )
thus lim n → ∞ n 2 ( n a − n + 1 a ) = lim n → ∞ n ( n + 1 ) n 2 ln a = ln a
Just do a=1 and it is quite obvious that the limit is 0 as the nth and the (n+1)th root of 1 is 1 so their difference is 0. The only answer that would make this work is ln(a).
More of a remark, not a full answer: A cheap way to get the answer is observe that when a = 1 , n a − n + 1 a = 1 n − 1 n + 1 = 1 − 1 = 0 so lim n → ∞ n 2 ⋅ 0 = lim n → ∞ 0 = 0 . But only ln ( 1 ) = 0 ... Maybe consider adding 0 as an option?
Im not sure if I’m right but If we let a = 1 and the limit = 0 as n approaches infinity so the only one of options that fits this condition is ln a
The simplest solution I found was setting a = 1. In this case the answer is always 0. The only answer that fits this is ln(a). If 0 < a < 1, the second term is always negative, and if a > 1, the second term is always positive. This gives more evidence that the only possible answer is ln(a).
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The entire limit can be written as :-
n → ∞ lim n 2 1 a n 1 − a n + 1 1 ( 0 0 f o r m )
So By L'Hospital Rule :-
n → ∞ lim ( ln ( a ) ) . n 3 − 2 ( ( n + 1 ) 2 1 − n 2 1 )
(Note that I have made the approximation that a n 1 tends to 1 as n tends to ∞ )
So rearranging we see that it is :-
n → ∞ lim ( ln ( a ) ) . 2 n 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) . n 3 .
which tends to 1 .