This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Aditya Thomas , I have changed your question to the present one. Because the original question x → ∞ lim x 3 ( e x − 1 ) tan 2 θ → ∞ and also x → ∞ lim x 3 ( e x − 1 ) tan 2 x → ∞ . I hope this is okay. Hope that you learn up LaTex soon.
Without L'Hopital's rule:
Note that x → 0 lim x sinh x = 1 and x t o 0 lim x sin x = 1 .
sinh x = 2 e x − e − x = 2 e − x ( e 2 x − 1 ) = 2 e − x ( e x + 1 ) ( e x − 1 )
Thus, what I'm going to do is rewrite the limit as:
x → 0 lim 2 e − x ( e x + 1 ) ( e x − 1 ) ⋅ x 3 cos 2 x sin 2 x ⋅ e − x ( e x + 1 ) 2
= x → 0 lim x 3 cos 2 x sin 2 x sinh x ⋅ e − x ( e x + 1 ) 2
= x → 0 lim x sin x ⋅ x sin x ⋅ x sinh x ⋅ cos 2 x 1 ⋅ e − x ( e x + 1 ) 2
Break it up into a product of five limits, and the first four all exist and equal one, and the last, upon substituting in x = 0 , we get 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L = x → 0 lim x 3 ( e x − 1 ) tan 2 x = x → 0 lim x e x − 1 ( x tan x ) 2 = x → 0 lim 1 e x ( 1 sec 2 x ) 2 = 1 Both are 0/0 cases, L’H o ˆ pital’s rule applies. Differentiate up and down