This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The last step can also be done formally like this:
( i = 3 ∏ ∞ i i − 2 ) ( i = 5 ∏ ∞ i − 2 i ) = 3 1 × 4 2 × i = 5 ∏ ∞ ( i i − 2 ⋅ i − 2 i ) = 6 1 × i = 5 ∏ ∞ ( 1 ) = 6 1
Nice Observation !!
Are you implying Wei Xian's last step wasn't done formally? Sigma/pi form does not automatically mean that your steps are rigorous.
Nope, I'm implying that I'm lazy. :P
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
i = 3 ∏ ∞ i 2 i 2 − 4 = i = 3 ∏ ∞ ( i i − 2 ) ( i i + 2 ) = i = 3 ∏ ∞ i i − 2 i = 3 ∏ ∞ i i + 2 This can be written as: [ ( 3 1 ) ( 4 2 ) ( 5 3 ) ( 6 4 ) . . . . . . ] [ ( 3 5 ) ( 4 6 ) ( 5 7 ) ( 6 8 ) . . . . . . ] Cancelling out intermediate terms, we obtain: 3 ⋅ 4 1 ⋅ 2 = 6 1