n → ∞ lim ( 2 n p + n q ) n , p q > 0 e q u a l s
For set , click here
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The use of AM-GM gives you a lower bound of the limit
lim n → ∞ ( 2 n p + n q ) n ≥ lim n → ∞ ( n p q ) n = lim n → ∞ p q = p q
To prove the result you should find some upper bound that still tends to p q .
The answer is pq.I think your answer is wrong.This limit is of the form 1^infinity
lim n to infinity ([ 2 [ p ( 1 / n ) + q ( 1 / n ) ] )^n
1+ ( 2 p ( 1 / n ) + q ( 1 / n ) − 2 )^n using lim x to infinity (1+1/x)^x tends to e. e^ lim n to infinity( 2 ( p ( 1 / n ) − 1 + q ( 1 / n ) − 1 ) n )
e^ lim n to infinity 2 p ( 1 / n ) . l o g p + q ( 1 / n ) l o g q
Finally, we get (pq)^1/2
This can be easily solved using the options. First let's put p=q=1.From this we get 1this eliminates option 4.next let us put p=q. Doing so we get p as the answer. The only option which gives p as the answer when you put p=q is option 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I am not sure, so I expect to be corrected. First, lim n → ∞ n p − n q = 1 − 1 = 0 . So n p tends to be equal to n p . Then, applying MA-MG: lim n → ∞ ( 2 ( n p + n q ) ) n = lim n → ∞ ( n p q ) n = lim n → ∞ p q = p q
Note: I am pretty sure that I made a mistake