Lines Tangent to a Circle

Geometry Level 3

There are two lines of slope 2 5 - \frac{2}{5} that are tangent to a circle of radius 1 1 centered at the origin ( 0 , 0 ) (0,0) . Only one of these lines has a positive y y -intercept. Let the point of tangency of this line to the circle be ( x , y ) (x,y) . When x + y x+y is written in the form a b c , \frac{a \sqrt{b}}{c}, where gcd ( a , c ) = 1 \gcd(a,c)=1 and b b is not divisible by the square of any prime, what is a + b + c ? a+b+c?


The answer is 65.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Since the line joining the two points of tangency is perpendicular to the given two lines it will have slope 5 2 \dfrac{5}{2} . Since it passes through the origin, the slope of this line will also equal y x \dfrac{y}{x} , and so

y x = 5 2 y = 5 2 x \dfrac{y}{x} = \dfrac{5}{2} \Longrightarrow y = \dfrac{5}{2}x .

Since ( x , y ) (x,y) lies on the unit circle, we also know that x 2 + y 2 = 1 x^{2} + y^{2} = 1 . So upon substitution we have that

x 2 + 25 4 x 2 = 1 x 2 = 4 29 x = 2 29 29 x^{2} + \dfrac{25}{4}x^{2} = 1 \Longrightarrow x^{2} = \dfrac{4}{29} \Longrightarrow x = \dfrac{2}{29}\sqrt{29} .

This implies that y = 5 29 29 y = \dfrac{5}{29}\sqrt{29} , and so x + y = 7 29 29 x + y = \dfrac{7}{29}\sqrt{29} .

Thus a = 7 , b = 29 , c = 29 a = 7, b = 29, c = 29 and a + b + c = 65 a + b + c = \boxed{65} .

Josh Speckman
Aug 26, 2014

This problem can be solved by taking the derivative of the positive half of the unit circle ( x 1 x 2 - \dfrac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} ), setting this equal to 2 5 - \dfrac{2}{5} , and solving for x x to obtain x = 2 29 29 , y = 5 29 29 x=\dfrac{2 \sqrt{29}}{29}, y=\dfrac{5 \sqrt{29}}{29} and x + y = 7 29 29 x+y=\dfrac{7 \sqrt{29}}{29} . However, this method is very ugly and long, so I would like to know if there are any better solutions (or anything that doesn't involve calculus).

@Josh Speckman I've posted a solution that doesn't use calculus; hope it makes sense. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 9 months ago

I wouldn't consider this method as very ugly and long, though. It just takes a bit of algebra. :D

Thomas James Bautista - 5 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...