The Little Ice Age was a period of very cold temperatures between 1650-1700. Interestingly, this period coincided with a period of low sunspot activity, called the Maunder minimum. Sunspots, contrary to what you might think, are correlated with the radiance from the sun. While sunspots block radiation, they also appear when the sun is more active, and the net correlation is that the more sunspots, the more radiation from the sun. In the graph below, the total solar irradiance, or amount of energy the earth receives per square meter is shown. As you can see, there is indeed a very low number of sunspots during the Little Ice Age. If the total solar irradiance during the Little Ice Age is 1 3 6 0 . 1 5 W/m 2 , and the total solar irradiance today is at the peak of 1 3 6 1 . 8 W/m 2 , what is the corresponding temperature difference in Kelvin of the earth's surface, i.e. T t o d a y − T L i t t l e I c e A g e ?
Details and assumptions
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Clear solution. Only one thing: there is a typo in the final result. Should be 0.087
Question: If we calculate the absolute temperatures directly by using Stefan's law, we get the values around 3 9 3 K (!!). What goes wrong there??
Opps, sorry! Ya, it should be 0.087
The Stefan-Boltzmann law (which I shan't derive since it's well-available on the Wikipedia page ) dictates that, for some energy radiated per area, j ∗ and some thermodynamic temperature T : j ∗ = σ T 4
is true for the output for the temperature of a blackbody.
Since we are assuming equilibrium, then the converse also holds, but note that the Earth is not completely under sunlight, hence our constant, σ , doesn't. So, the most restrictive case we have is: j ∗ ∝ T 4
Since we are given the temperature and irradiance for one case, we can compute the proportionality constant l , by: j 0 ∗ = l T 0 4
Hence: T 0 4 j 0 ∗ = l = 2 8 7 4 1 3 6 1 . 8
So, for our final case gives us: 4 l j ∗ = T = 4 1 3 6 1 . 8 2 8 7 4 ⋅ 1 3 6 0 . 1 5 ≈ 2 8 6 . 9 1 3 0 3 K
Which, finally yields: T 0 − T ≈ 2 8 7 − 2 8 6 . 9 1 3 0 3 = 0 . 0 8 6 9 7 K
Our answer.
Question: If we calculate the absolute temperatures directly by using Stefan's law, we get the values around 3 9 3 K (!!). What goes wrong there??
Log in to reply
I mentioned it in my solution. Since we are discussing equilibrium, the relation goes from Temperature to radiance, the difference is that the body is not being illuminated entiely, so the constant doesn't hold.
We know from Stefan's law that P = aAT^{4} where P = Power a = stefan's constant T= temperature
In this question we are given P/A ratios. SO taking ratio of these ratios- 1360.15/1361.8 = (T/287)^{4} We get T = 286.013 SO T1 - T2 = 0.08697
For a black body ratio of solar irradiance(E) and fourth power of temperature(T^4) remains constant, i.e.,
E/(T^4) = constant(say k)
Let E1 and T1 be irradiance and temperature of Eath Little Ice Period and E2 and T2 be irradiance and temperature of Earth today.
(E1)/((T1)^4) = (E2)/((T2)^4)
((T1)^4) = (1360.15/1360.8) * (287^4)
T1 = 286.913 K
T2 - T1 = 287 - 286.913 = 0.087 (Ans)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By the formula P = k T 4 , where k are product of constants that includes emissivity, area, and Stefan-Boltzmann constant, this proportional relation can be used to solve the problem.
Hence, by P L i t t l e I c e A g e P t o d a y = T L i t t l e I c e A g e 4 T t o d a y 4 , plugging in
P t o d a y = 1 3 6 1 . 8 W , P L i t t l e I c e A g e = 1 3 6 0 . 1 5 , T t o d a y = 2 8 7 K , the value of T L i t t l e I c e A g e = 2 8 6 . 9 1 K
Hence, by T t o d a y − T L i t t l e I c e A g e
= 2 8 7 − 2 8 6 . 9 1
= 0 . 8 7 K