Logarithmic Derivatives of Numbers

The number-theoretical derivative D n Dn of a natural number n n is defined recursively by the rule D p = 1 for prime p ; D ( a b ) = a D b + D a b . Dp = 1\ \text{for prime}\ p;\ \ \ D(a\cdot b) = a\cdot Db + Da\cdot b. (Note the analogy to the product rule for derivatives in calculus.)

From this definition it follows, for instance, that if n = p a n = p^a , then D n = a p a 1 Dn = ap^{a-1} . An other concrete example is D ( 18 ) = D ( 2 9 ) = 2 D 9 + D 2 9 = 2 6 + 1 9 = 12 + 9 = 21. D(18) = D(2\cdot 9) = 2\cdot D9 + D2\cdot 9 \\ = 2\cdot 6 + 1\cdot 9 = 12 + 9 = 21.

We take number-theoretical derivatives to the next level and define the logarithmic derivative L n = D n n . Ln = \frac{Dn}n. (We call this "logarithmic derivative" based on the Calculus equality, d ( ln f ( x ) ) / d x = ( d f ( x ) / d x ) / x d(\ln f(x))/dx = (df(x)/dx)/x .)

For instance, L ( 18 ) = D ( 18 ) 18 = 21 18 = 7 6 . L(18) = \frac{D(18)}{18} = \frac{21}{18} = \frac{7}{6}.

Question: What are the two smallest distinct natural numbers a , b a, b for which L a = L b La = Lb ? Give your answer as the sum a + b a + b .


The answer is 31.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

It is easy to check that the logarithmic derivative has the following properties: L ( p ) = 1 p ( p prime ) ; L ( a b ) = L ( a ) + L ( b ) . L(p) = \frac{1}{p}\ (p\ \text{prime});\ \ \ L(a\cdot b) = L(a) + L(b). Therefore if a number has prime factor decomposition n = p i n = \prod p_i , then L ( n ) = 1 / p i L(n) = \sum 1/p_i . Now we look for two numbers, with prime decompositions a = p i , b = q j a = \prod p_i,\ b = \prod q_j such that 1 p i = 1 q j . \sum \frac1{p_i} = \sum \frac1{q_j}. If a a and b b have a common factor, we can simply divide it out to arrive at a smaller solution; therefore we may assume that the p i p_i and q j q_j are entirely different. The only way in which sums of reciprocals of coprime p i p_i and q j q_j can be equal is if each adds up to a who number, i.e. if the exponent of each p p is a multiple of p p , etc. This leads us to the solutions a = 2 2 = 4 , b = 3 3 = 27 , a + b = 31 . a = 2^2 = 4,\ \ b = 3^3 = 27,\ \ a + b = \boxed{31}. Indeed, L ( 4 ) = 2 2 = 1 ; L ( 27 ) = 3 3 = 1. L(4) = \frac2 2 = 1;\ \ L(27) = \frac3 3 = 1.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...