True or False?
There exists a real matrix A = [ a c b d ] such that A 2 0 1 9 = I 2 and a = 2 0 1 9 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
nice problem. i made a random guess. the hint is the minimal polynomial divides the horrible polynomial x^2019-1. all the roots of the horrible polynomial are distinct so the minimal polynomial has degree 2. rest is construction of the matrix which satisfies the condition.
Cubing the rotation matrix R = [ cos θ sin θ − sin θ cos θ ] for θ = 3 2 π will give the identity matrix I 2 . In other words, B 3 = I 2 for B = [ − 2 1 2 3 − 2 3 − 2 1 ] .
This also means that ( C B C − 1 ) 3 = I 2 for any invertible matrix C = [ a ′ c ′ b ′ d ′ ] .
Now, if A = [ a c b d ] = C B C − 1 , then A 3 = I 2 , which in turn means A 2 0 1 9 = ( A 3 ) 6 7 3 = ( I 2 ) 6 7 3 = I 2 . All we need now is to find values for a ′ , b ′ , c ′ , and d ′ such that a = 2 0 1 9 , and the statement will be proved true.
Using C − 1 = [ a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ d ′ a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ − c ′ a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ − b ′ a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ a ′ ] and a little bit of matrix multiplication, we find that a = a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ 1 ( − 2 1 a ′ d ′ + 2 3 b ′ d ′ + 2 3 a ′ c ′ + 2 1 b ′ c ′ ) , b = a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ 1 ( 2 1 a ′ b ′ − 2 3 b ′ 2 − 2 3 a ′ 2 − 2 1 a ′ b ′ ) , c = a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ 1 ( − 2 1 c ′ d ′ + 2 3 b ′ 2 + 2 3 c ′ 2 + 2 1 c ′ d ′ ) , and d = a ′ d ′ − b ′ c ′ 1 ( 2 1 b ′ c ′ − 2 3 b ′ d ′ − 2 3 a ′ c ′ − 2 1 a ′ d ′ ) .
There are several real solutions to obtain a = 2 0 1 9 , one being a ′ = 1 , b ′ = 3 4 0 3 9 3 , c ′ = 0 , and d ′ = 1 . These values give us b = 3 8 1 5 6 7 6 2 3 , c = 2 3 , and d = − 2 0 2 0 .
Therefore, [ 2 0 1 9 2 3 3 8 1 5 6 7 6 2 3 − 2 0 2 0 ] 2 0 1 9 = I 2 , which is sufficient to show that the statement is true .
Looks good! A very systematic solution! Thank you!
For the sake of variety, I will post my solution as well.
Log in to reply
Thanks! I would love to see your solution as well.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As David observed, it suffices to find a matrix A with A 3 = I 2 , since A 2 0 1 9 = ( A 3 ) 6 7 3 . Since A 3 − I 2 = ( A − I 2 ) ( A 2 + A + I 2 ) , it suffices to find a matrix with A 2 + A + I 2 = 0 . By Hamilton-Cayley, it suffices to find a matrix with t r ( A ) = − 1 and d e t ( A ) = 1 (and a = 2 0 1 9 , of course). Such a matrix can be constructed by inspection, for example, A = [ 2 0 1 9 − 1 2 0 1 9 × 2 0 2 0 + 1 − 2 0 2 0 ] .
(This proof can be presented more elegantly in terms of complex eigenvalues, but I attempted to keep things as basic as possible.)