In hydraulic engineering, "head loss" is not a cruel medieval punishment, but it refers to the apparent loss of pressure due to the energy loss in various elements of the water transport line. For example, if one stands next to a water tower of 30 m height and aims a garden hose vertically up, one would expect the water to go to 30 m height (according to Torricelli's law or the Bernoulli's equation). Instead, the water only goes up to 10 m because of the losses in the pipes, water valves, the garden hose, and the nozzle.
In this example, how high will the water go (relative to the original ground level) if one takes the end of the hose to 10 m height and aims the nozzle vertically up?
Assume that the loss in each element in the transport line is proportional to the square of the velocity. No one else is using the water from the water tower.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
According to Bernoulli's equation
2 1 ρ v 2 + ρ g h + p = c o n s t ,
where v is the velocity of the fluid ρ is the density p is the pressure and h is the elevation. This equation describes the conservation of energy for an ideal fluid, with no losses. First, let us see how high will the water go in this case.
We compare the top of the water tower ( v = 0 , p = p 0 , h = h 0 ) with the exit of the nozzle ( p = p 0 , h = 0 ) and obtain ρ g h 0 + p 0 = 2 1 ρ v 2 + p 0 . Here p 0 is the atmospheric pressure and h 0 is the height of the tower and v is the velocity at the nozzle. The velocity is v = 2 g h 0 . With this initial velocity the water will go to a maximum height of h 0 .
If the losses are proportional to the square of the velocity, each element in the transport line will contribute a term of k i v i 2 , where k i depends on the design of the element (valve, nozzle) and v i is the velocity of the flow in that element. Due to the equation of continuity (and to the fact that no one else is using the water) the velocity in each element can be expressed in terms of the velocity in the nozzle, v i = v A / A i where A and A i are the corresponding cross sections, and the loss is k i v i 2 = k i ( A / A i ) 2 v 2 . Accordingly, the modified Bernoulli's equation, that includes the losses, can be written as
2 1 ρ v 2 + ρ g h + p + k 1 ( A 1 A ) 2 v 2 + k 2 ( A 2 A ) 2 v 2 + k 3 ( A 3 A ) 2 v 2 + . . . = c o n s t , or
2 1 ρ v 2 + ρ g h + p + k ′ v 2 = c o n s t or
2 1 ( ρ + k ′ ) v 2 + ρ g h + p = c o n s t
Here k ′ = k 1 ( A 1 A ) 2 + k 2 ( A 2 A ) 2 + k 3 ( A 3 A ) 2 + . . . represents the sum of all the losses in the water line. This is a remarkable result, similar to Bernoulli's equation, except it looks like the water is more "dense" when it comes to the calculation of the kinetic energy and it has its original density for the calculation of potential energy.
Comparing the top of the water tower to the nozzle again yields a velocity of
v ′ = 2 g h 0 ρ + k ′ ρ ,
and maximum height of the outgoing water is
h = ρ + k ′ ρ h 0
With the numbers in the problem ρ + k ′ ρ = h 0 h = 3 1 . If we are at 10m elevation the possible maximum height relative to that level is h 0 ′ = 2 0 m, and the actual height is h ′ = 2 0 m / 3 = 6 . 6 m . Therefore relative to the original ground level the elevation will be 16.6 m