This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I'm very curious too! So I'm working on a simpler version of this problem, solving for x in l o g x 9 + l o g x 2 7 8 1 = 6 and I substituted l o g 3 x = y to get the equation ( 3 y ) 3 − y = 9 . For that last equation, my teacher says to use differential equations, so I'm teaching myself that right now. Thus, I assume that if you do some substituting around like you did, you can get an equation that can be solved using differential equations!!
simply substituting x = 256 1 +.75 - .75 = 1
That's not an analytical solution. anyone can guess and check
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I have not been successful in obtaining a solution using only algebraic manipulations. A rewrite and a few "qualified" guesses did the job for me.
Let us rewrite the equation lo g x 2 5 6 + lo g lo g x 6 4 3 4 + lo g lo g lo g x 2 6 4 1 2 = 1
Since lo g x a = lo g 2 x lo g 2 a , we can let y = lo g 2 x and get the following
lo g 2 x lo g 2 2 5 6 + lo g 2 lo g 2 x lo g 2 6 4 lo g 2 3 4 + lo g 2 ( lo g 2 lo g 2 x lo g 2 2 − lo g 2 6 4 ) lo g 2 2 y 8 + lo g 2 y 6 lo g 2 3 4 + lo g 2 ( lo g 2 y 1 − 6 ) 1 y 8 + lo g 2 6 − lo g 2 y 2 − lo g 2 3 + lo g 2 6 − lo g 2 lo g 2 y 1 = = = 1
Let f ( y ) = y 8 + lo g 2 6 − lo g 2 y 2 − lo g 2 3 + lo g 2 6 − lo g 2 lo g 2 y 1 We can perform a few tests on f to get a feeling of its behavior.
Especially, plugging in powers of 2 allows us to simplify the function expression. Using that approach, we find that f ( 8 ) = 1 . This means lo g 2 x = 8 , and so it follows that x = 2 5 6
I would be curious to see a pure algebraic solution :-).