A mathematician decided to stay married to his wife for as long as she (cumulatively) complimented him more often than she nagged him. Once the cumulative nagging caught up with the cumulative compliments, he would divorce her.
If N is the number of years since the wedding, he determined that the cumulative number of compliments was 4 0 N , while the cumulative amount of nagging was 2 N 2 . Assuming he stayed true to his word, for how many years did he stay married to his wife?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I sure hope this isn't reflective of your personal life!
It would be better to explicitly use inequalities, instead of an equation, to represent this problem. In this way, if we do not obtain an integer answer, we know which bound to look at.
The phrasing "after how many years did he divorce his wife" needs to be clarified. What is the starting point?
It is not reflective of MY personal life.
However, the great mathematician Leibniz once was deciding whether to marry a certain woman. He made two lists -- one of advantages to being married to her, and the second of disadvantages. The second list was longer, so he didn't marry her.
Log in to reply
I sure hope it was a weighted list!
Can you edit the problem to indicate the starting date? Alternatively ask "for how many years was he married to his wife".
Log in to reply
We need to find the value of N such that the amount of compliments is the same as the amount of nagging.
4 0 N = 2 N 2 N 2 = 2 0 N N 2 − 2 0 N = 0 N ( N − 2 0 ) = 0 N = 0 , N = 2 0
We take the positive value of N , therefore N = 2 0
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We need to find when 4 0 N − 2 N 2 reaches 0.
4 0 N = 2 N 2
Dividing by N
40 = 2 N
N = 20